Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
If you can get like a Samsung 970 EVO for os and apps. Then get 1TB sata ssd for games. For downloads, videos, pictures and storing other files, get a 2tb or larger 7200rpm hdd
And, OP, all SSDs slow down when they're getting close to being full.
Also, you wouldn't really notice loading time improvements with an NVMe over a SATA SSD, maybe half a second, tops.
However, if you can get it cheaper, I don't see why not. Better for less.
It should just be common sense on any drive that has active installs of os, apps, games on it. As a good chunk of large space will be needed free to make room for updating things
https://www.rakuten.com/shop/adata/product/ASU800SS-2TT-C/
They used to sell a Micron 1100 2TB for <$200 but haven't seen it stocked and on sale in awhile.
The short answer is yes, the 660p would perform better. It's an NVMe drive and is going to be 2x-3x faster as a result than any SATA drive. That being said, running a 970 evo, 660p and a 850 evo, I don't really notice much difference most of the time. They're all pretty much just fast enough.
What people are quibbling over, with "longevity", is TBW, Terabytes Written, which the 660p is a little on the low side compared to the 860 evo. However, you sit down and do the math and you have to write huge amounts of data every day, without fail, for years before you hit the TBW stated in the warranty and that's not even the actual write limit for the drive...
So let's take the 1TB 660p, with a 200TBW. 200TB = 200,000GB. Let's say you write 100GB a day, ever day, without fail. Not a real world scenario any normal user would ever come close to, but it would take 2000 days, or ~5.47 years to hit 200TBW. Real world usage is going to be much lower, no where near 100GB a day for 2,000 days straight.
And 200TBW isn't a hard number, 201TBW and all drives are dead, it's just the warranty value, and in most of the SSD torture tests I've seen a SSD can often write 1.5-3x the TBW stated in the warranty.
I mean most of the time when people start worrying over write limits it's right before they start grossly overestimating how much data they write to disk. Do the math, track how much data you write over months or whatever and you'll learn exactly one thing: It's nothing worth worrying about and hasn't been for most of this decade.
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
12,945 User benchmarks, average bench 87%
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 403 409 421 416 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding