Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The 3900x is great for 'gaming', you don't NEED it though.
Personally, I'd call it mid-range.
Because of where it's placed in the product stack and how it performs comapred to Intel.
That doesn't mean it's weak though. It's plenty for just gaming, just like the 3600/x.
Not much difference between the 3700x and 3900x. Games won't make use of the 3900x fully.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GjSiLbCtHU
Don't tell people how to spend their money. My 3900x works perfectly with any game. Except Max Payne.
It doesn't hurt to have more core/threads, and in that sense, the 2700X would prolly be able to hold its own in games for the foreseeable future (8C/16T is the sweet spot in my opinion). So, if OP has the 2700X, just do what you want with it (be it gaming or productivity) and it should be fine (assuming OP has a decent GPU like a GTX1070/RX VEGA56 or higher).