Samsung C24FG73 or AOC C24G1(or any other 144hz monitor in the same budget)

[Kokmagok]

Thx

[Kokmagok]

Also I get Razer DeathAdder Essential for free with the Samsung one

[Kokmagok]

I'm buying 144hz, because I've been having horrible Screen tearing(even vertical "screen jumping"), so I hope it will fix it.

[Talby]

I have the C24G1, picked it up at my local micro center - quite nice at $150 on sale

Comparing to the C24FG73 it looks very similar, the only feature it has over the AOC are "quantum dots"[en.wikipedia.org], which should give it more color gamut - not sure if it would be worth the extra price.

[Kokmagok]

The C24FG73 costs about 40$ more but comes with a extra mouse for that 40$(and I'd want new mouse) so I'll probably go for the C24FG73. Any other thoughts?

[Talby]

that's a good deal, go for it!

[Kokmagok]

Any other alternatives or is the C24FG73 the best option? Also is it worth it to buy monitor with Gsync or does 144hz itself fix most of the Screen tearing?

[Kokmagok]

Also how does Dell S2716DG stand compared to those?

[Autumn_]

引用自 Ancer：

Any other alternatives or is the C24FG73 the best option? Also is it worth it to buy monitor with Gsync or does 144hz itself fix most of the Screen tearing?

G-Sync is kind of pointless with Nvidia cards now supporting freesync (10 series and up.)
But, 144hz doesn't ''FIX'' screentearing, but if you've got the FPS to back it up, you probably won't see it all that much; you could even run Vsync and it not feel all that laggy. (Because you're updating 144 times a second instead of 60.)

引用自 Ancer：

Also how does Dell S2716DG stand compared to those?

It's a little more expensive, but it's a better monitor.
1440p, 144hz, TN panel with great average pixel response time, and low input lag, great viewing angles, and colour accuracy. Plus it's got G-Sync, which IS better than freesync. (But it doesn't really matter.)

If you don't have the hardware to push 100>FPS all the time in 1440p, I wouldn't consider it, unless you're planning to upgrade any time soon.

It's better to go for a 1080p144hz monitor if you don't have the hardware to push 1440p144hz.

The difference between the two you've got there are;

The Samsung one has better colour accuracy, and will have deeper blacks, but higher average pixel response times. (Possibly has an ''overdrive'' feature which should improve this, but I don't know, I haven't looked if it does.)

And the AOC one has slightly worse colour accuracy, and will have worse blacks, but lower average pixel response times, and less input lag.
(Lower pixel response = less ghosting.)

Still, even though the AOC has 'worse' colour accuracy, it's still more than acceptable.
I've read that AOC also has ♥♥♥♥ anti-glare coating on some models, apparently ''it looks like there's a flim grain filter over the monitor.''
(Talby, can you speak to the quality of the anti-glare on the C24G1?)

[Kokmagok]

引用自 Autumn：

引用自 Ancer：

Any other alternatives or is the C24FG73 the best option? Also is it worth it to buy monitor with Gsync or does 144hz itself fix most of the Screen tearing?

G-Sync is kind of pointless with Nvidia cards now supporting freesync (10 series and up.)
But, 144hz doesn't ''FIX'' screentearing, but if you've got the FPS to back it up, you probably won't see it all that much; you could even run Vsync and it not feel all that laggy. (Because you're updating 144 times a second instead of 60.)

引用自 Ancer：

Also how does Dell S2716DG stand compared to those?

It's a little more expensive, but it's a better monitor.
1440p, 144hz, TN panel with great average pixel response time, and low input lag, great viewing angles, and colour accuracy. Plus it's got G-Sync, which IS better than freesync. (But it doesn't really matter.)

If you don't have the hardware to push 100>FPS all the time in 1440p, I wouldn't consider it, unless you're planning to upgrade any time soon.

It's better to go for a 1080p144hz monitor if you don't have the hardware to push 1440p144hz.

The difference between the two you've got there are;

The Samsung one has better colour accuracy, and will have deeper blacks, but higher average pixel response times. (Possibly has an ''overdrive'' feature which should improve this, but I don't know, I haven't looked if it does.)

And the AOC one has slightly worse colour accuracy, and will have worse blacks, but lower average pixel response times, and less input lag.
(Lower pixel response = less ghosting.)

Still, even though the AOC has 'worse' colour accuracy, it's still more than acceptable.
I've read that AOC also has ♥♥♥♥ anti-glare coating on some models, apparently ''it looks like there's a flim grain filter over the monitor.''
(Talby, can you speak to the quality of the anti-glare on the C24G1?)

How much worse is the Ghosting on C24FG73? Also is the "worse" even noticable(what I'm trying to say is that it might be worse, but the C24FG73 is just good enough that it in the end doesn't matter). And which one would you recommend me between those two personally(C24FG73 and AOC C24G1)?

[Kokmagok]

Also does Response time = pixel response time? If so the two monitors(samsung, AOC) should be the same

[Autumn_]

引用自 Ancer：

引用自 Autumn：

G-Sync is kind of pointless with Nvidia cards now supporting freesync (10 series and up.)
But, 144hz doesn't ''FIX'' screentearing, but if you've got the FPS to back it up, you probably won't see it all that much; you could even run Vsync and it not feel all that laggy. (Because you're updating 144 times a second instead of 60.)


It's a little more expensive, but it's a better monitor.
1440p, 144hz, TN panel with great average pixel response time, and low input lag, great viewing angles, and colour accuracy. Plus it's got G-Sync, which IS better than freesync. (But it doesn't really matter.)

If you don't have the hardware to push 100>FPS all the time in 1440p, I wouldn't consider it, unless you're planning to upgrade any time soon.

It's better to go for a 1080p144hz monitor if you don't have the hardware to push 1440p144hz.

The difference between the two you've got there are;

The Samsung one has better colour accuracy, and will have deeper blacks, but higher average pixel response times. (Possibly has an ''overdrive'' feature which should improve this, but I don't know, I haven't looked if it does.)

And the AOC one has slightly worse colour accuracy, and will have worse blacks, but lower average pixel response times, and less input lag.
(Lower pixel response = less ghosting.)

Still, even though the AOC has 'worse' colour accuracy, it's still more than acceptable.
I've read that AOC also has ♥♥♥♥ anti-glare coating on some models, apparently ''it looks like there's a flim grain filter over the monitor.''
(Talby, can you speak to the quality of the anti-glare on the C24G1?)

How much worse is the Ghosting on C24FG73? Also is the "worse" even noticable(what I'm trying to say is that it might be worse, but the C24FG73 is just good enough that it in the end doesn't matter). And which one would you recommend me between those two personally(C24FG73 and AOC C24G1)?

The C24FG73, if it doesn't have an overdrive feature, should have noticeable ghosting.
(Because it takes longer (on average) for pixels to respond, than it does for the monitor to display another frame.)
I'd have a look if it has an overdrive feature, if it does, then decide from there.

What do you want it for?
Gaming, more competitive oriented?
Media, videos, photo viewing, enjoyable super colour accurate experience?

引用自 Ancer：

Also does Response time = pixel response time? If so the two monitors(samsung, AOC) should be the same

Ignore what response time they say it is, because ''1ms'' / ''2ms'' or some ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like that is almost always 'fastest measured pixel response time.'
You go by averages, lower average = better, higher average = worse.

[Kokmagok]

引用自 Autumn：

引用自 Ancer：

How much worse is the Ghosting on C24FG73? Also is the "worse" even noticable(what I'm trying to say is that it might be worse, but the C24FG73 is just good enough that it in the end doesn't matter). And which one would you recommend me between those two personally(C24FG73 and AOC C24G1)?

The C24FG73, if it doesn't have an overdrive feature, should have noticeable ghosting.
(Because it takes longer (on average) for pixels to respond, than it does for the monitor to display another frame.)
I'd have a look if it has an overdrive feature, if it does, then decide from there.

What do you want it for?
Gaming, more competitive oriented?
Media, videos, photo viewing, enjoyable super colour accurate experience?

引用自 Ancer：

Also does Response time = pixel response time? If so the two monitors(samsung, AOC) should be the same

Ignore what response time they say it is, because ''1ms'' / ''2ms'' or some ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like that is almost always 'fastest measured pixel response time.'
You go by averages, lower average = better, higher average = worse.

I'm heading for Gaming, maybe a bit more competive(I play a lots of FPSes)
Also my current monitor's response time is 3ms, so it should be a visible upgrade.

[Kokmagok]

Also from what I have seen Samsung C24FG73 has some kind of "low input lag" mode or "max response time" options

[Autumn_]

引用自 Ancer：

引用自 Autumn：

The C24FG73, if it doesn't have an overdrive feature, should have noticeable ghosting.
(Because it takes longer (on average) for pixels to respond, than it does for the monitor to display another frame.)
I'd have a look if it has an overdrive feature, if it does, then decide from there.

What do you want it for?
Gaming, more competitive oriented?
Media, videos, photo viewing, enjoyable super colour accurate experience?


Ignore what response time they say it is, because ''1ms'' / ''2ms'' or some ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like that is almost always 'fastest measured pixel response time.'
You go by averages, lower average = better, higher average = worse.

I'm heading for Gaming, maybe a bit more competive(I play a lots of FPSes)
Also my current monitor's response time is 3ms, so it should be a visible upgrade.

''3ms'' claimed the manufacturer, or did you check it's average response time?

And, I would go for the AOC C24G1 then. Personally.

UNLESS

引用自 Ancer：

Also from what I have seen Samsung C24FG73 has some kind of "low input lag" mode or "max response time" options

What was the AVERAGE response time with the 'overdrive' mode enabled?

[Kokmagok]

This site: https://www.displayspecifications.com/en/comparison/14c95e0b5 says that AOC has 4ms average while the samsung one 8ms