Would an I7 4790K bottleneck an RTX 2080 TI at 4K 144HZ?

[sex having gamer]

help pls

[sex having gamer]

Publicado originalmente por jefedemuchanina:

Publicado originalmente por hawkeye:

That's a 3700x thing. Both the 3700x and 9700k bottleneck a 2080ti in a small number of games but not the same games. It's mentioned in digital foundry's youtube 3700x review.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SY2g9f7i5Js

I really wouldnt care but a newer chip bottlenecking and still getting lower fps than a 9700k is annoying and considering they only ran their 9700k at 4.6ghz all core thats rather embarrassing to have those differences because ryzen 3000 chips gain nothing from oc’ing i get the same fps at 4ghz as at 4.35

so like...should i buy an I9 9900K?

[Malygos]

Publicado originalmente por Had to do it to em:

Publicado originalmente por jefedemuchanina:

I really wouldnt care but a newer chip bottlenecking and still getting lower fps than a 9700k is annoying and considering they only ran their 9700k at 4.6ghz all core thats rather embarrassing to have those differences because ryzen 3000 chips gain nothing from oc’ing i get the same fps at 4ghz as at 4.35

so like...should i buy an I9 9900K?

If all you are doing is gaming i wouldnt even get that unless you find it on sale but for that id ask a couple guys around here with 9th gen chips indont have one sonim not sure but i can say at 1440p 144hz you are gonna bottleneck if you go ryzen. Im honestly dreading seeing what cyberpunk is gonna do to this thing

https://imgur.com/a/Kgj4Drr

Ill edit that in i legit thought my gpu was ♥♥♥♥♥♥ so i put my wifes 1080ti in there and started testing stuff thats watch dogs 2 a 3700x bottlenecking a 1080 ti lol

[SeriousCCIE]

well back to the monitor, if you drop the money on something good that will last ten years, it won't matter what video card you get because the monitor will outlive any card you get anytime soon.

i've got one of those ROG PG7AQ models with g-sync that is working just fine for me. It is also really cool in another way; I can rotate it 90 degrees and play pinball games like I am looking at the vertical field, rather than a fat/wide monitor.

It is a perk I did not consider when I first bought it, and despite it being sort of niche, I know this monitor is going to last because it's almost been good for lots of things besides gaming. Doesn't stress the eyes, handles whatever resolution I throw at it or GUI size adjustments, etc. Some people don't want a monitor that can't do 144hz or something like that; I am not trying to game at 4k at 144hz so my expectations match the monitor.

I had an R9-290 from AMD hooked to it and was running things (but not all things) at 4k; the monitor was an upgrade from 2560x1440 that had a capacitor inside it blow out (I eventually pried it apart and found and fixed that, but I'd already bought this monitor for future proofing and the future arrived, and so...).

What I am saying is that you can connect a card that isn't as good as the monitor (and by no means am I saying buy the one I got; just that I like the one I did get) and then upgrade the card later and the monitor won't have disappointed you up until you can make full use of it--and when you do that, you'll be so glad you had a capable monitor that could do it!

Nay sayers will always say nay if you decide to buy something they wouldn't get for themselves, but you need to consider how you'd likely use it, the features, and what you'd connect to it. And also 5, 10 years from now--when it might become a secondary monitor, what will connect to it then.

[sex having gamer]

Publicado originalmente por SeriousCCIE:

well back to the monitor, if you drop the money on something good that will last ten years, it won't matter what video card you get because the monitor will outlive any card you get anytime soon.

i've got one of those ROG PG7AQ models with g-sync that is working just fine for me. It is also really cool in another way; I can rotate it 90 degrees and play pinball games like I am looking at the vertical field, rather than a fat/wide monitor.

It is a perk I did not consider when I first bought it, and despite it being sort of niche, I know this monitor is going to last because it's almost been good for lots of things besides gaming. Doesn't stress the eyes, handles whatever resolution I throw at it or GUI size adjustments, etc. Some people don't want a monitor that can't do 144hz or something like that; I am not trying to game at 4k at 144hz so my expectations match the monitor.

I had an R9-290 from AMD hooked to it and was running things (but not all things) at 4k; the monitor was an upgrade from 2560x1440 that had a capacitor inside it blow out (I eventually pried it apart and found and fixed that, but I'd already bought this monitor for future proofing and the future arrived, and so...).

What I am saying is that you can connect a card that isn't as good as the monitor (and by no means am I saying buy the one I got; just that I like the one I did get) and then upgrade the card later and the monitor won't have disappointed you up until you can make full use of it--and when you do that, you'll be so glad you had a capable monitor that could do it!

Nay sayers will always say nay if you decide to buy something they wouldn't get for themselves, but you need to consider how you'd likely use it, the features, and what you'd connect to it. And also 5, 10 years from now--when it might become a secondary monitor, what will connect to it then.

What's a pg27aq? Do you mean the pg27uq?