Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I'm not saying it won't do well. But some games, any i5 is going to struggle
Not only is it not fully unleashed at 1080p, but you're also further wasting its potential it with a 60Hz monitor. You've essentially paid 500$ for something a 1660 Ti could have done. If it were me, i'd put the money you saved on a regularly priced 2080 towards either a 1080p 144Hz or 1440p 100-144Hz monitor.
If course, but that doesn't mean the bottleneck will affect me poorly. Hell, you could say my current GPU is also bottlenecked by the CPU because it can do 150 FPS but the CPU only allows it to render 120, but since my monitor only has a 60 Hz refresh rate, it bottlenecks the GPU more than the CPU. If you play on an old game like Ultimate Doom, it should be able to put out 500 FPS but my CPU limits it to 200. Doesn't mean I suffer. I practically don't notice anything cause the game isn't even stressing the card OR CPU. It's practically idle.
BUT, since some of my games DO struggle with my current GPU, then I can be sure that at least this card will give me minimum 60 FPS. I don't care whether it can reach 90, 120, or 150 afterwards. My monitor can't render those extra frames anyway.
1440p/60 would be better suited for the rtx 2080 and shouldn't strain the cpu anymore then it already does at 1080p
Coming from a gtx 970, and staying at 1080p, you would be fine to step up to a gtx 1660 ti or rtx 2060 super and it would be a good improvement over any 970
Thanks. Say, how does the 2060 Super fare against the 2070? I'm only asking cause I saw a 2070 for $469 and if some of the Super cards are only $20 cheaper, would I not be better served getting the 2070 then?
Where you seeing it for $469. It's listed on Amazon for $459.
Yeah, sorry. That's what I meant. The point is, the 2060s haven't yet dropped into stock. They're only available for backorder. But nonetheless, is the current 2070 still more powerful than the 2060 Super?
If I'm not mistaken they're supposed to be similar in performance. I'd wait at this point if you haven't bought it yet. I paid $500 for my 2070 and prices are significantly dropping. Only buy now if you really have a gaming emergency.
Well, yeah, I mean, I wouldn't call my current situation a gaming emergency. It's just that I don't expect any of these cards to get below $400 or $350 anytime soon in the future. The days of Mid-Tier cards being in the $250-$350 are long past. Especially with inflation taken into account. I got my 970 for $350 at the time, but I think it was a YEAR after release anyway. $100 less than a typical 2070 is still a fair price to me.
Nah, I don't think the 2070 would go below $400 either any time soon anyways. I can see it maybe dropping another $10-20 bucks in the next month or so but really not much more than that. If it's worth waiting for that much of a drop. I Sucks for people like me that paid $500 for it lol, you're still getting a great deal at $459.
I consider this card a good deal right now. But it's on a backorder, so who knows whether they'll have it in stock. https://www.newegg.com/gigabyte-geforce-rtx-2060-super-gv-n206swf2oc-8gd/p/N82E16814932174?Item=N82E16814932174
You try ordering it directly from Nvidia for $399? https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/rtx-2060-super/
No, but theirs is a regular one anyway. This is a GIGABYTE OCed one.