5.7.2019 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | PassMark - CPU Mark

['Bacardi]

There seems appear new AMD CPU in benchmark list. Looks really promising.
But I would still wait new benchmarks after 7.7



CPU Single Threat Bench
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html

CPU Bench
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/desktop.html

[Autumn_]

Originally posted by Bacardi:

There seems appear new AMD CPU in benchmark list. Looks really promising.
But I would still wait new benchmarks after 7.7

:summer2019boost:

CPU Single Threat Bench
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html

CPU Bench
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/desktop.html

I honestly don't trust many '''leaks''', and I'm not familiar with this sites credibility.
So, wait until the day after tomorrow, I wouldn't put my faith in this.

['Bacardi]

Not sure either, could there be way hack results during uploading them ?
I wait Gamer Nexus and else previews and benchs.

[Autumn_]

Originally posted by Bacardi:

Not sure either, could there be way hack results during uploading them ?
I wait Gamer Nexus and else previews and benchs.

There's a way to 'hack' anything.
But, it's doubtful anyone would bother to do such a thing to some random CPU scores website.

And, GamersNexus and Buildzoid (Actually hardcore overclocking), are the only 2 reviewers I fully trust.
The others are okay, but I feel like they're biased in some way.
Where as Steve from GN just talks ♥♥♥♥ on everyone and says the truth. And Buildzoid is an AMD fanboy, but he also tells the truth, he's the good kind of fanboy.

[hawkeye]

Originally posted by Bacardi:

Not sure either, could there be way hack results during uploading them ?
I wait Gamer Nexus and else previews and benchs.

Just about every windows programmer would know how to change data being sent by a program. The ability to intercept data and modify it is built into the windows programming languages.

[tacoshy]

If you look at the benchmark, it barely beats an 9900K at stock settings of 3.6GHz while most 9900K can run 4.8GHz all core and in single core easily higher.

[Autumn_]

Originally posted by tacoshy:

If you look at the benchmark, it barely beats an 9900K at stock settings of 3.6GHz while most 9900K can run 4.8GHz and in single core easily higher.

I don't know how this website does things; does it run at stock clocks? Or does it allow for boosting?

['Bacardi]

Originally posted by tacoshy:

If you look at the benchmark, it barely beats an 9900K at stock settings of 3.6GHz while most 9900K can run 4.8GHz all core and in single core easily higher.

Does it need beat 9900K and to be best of the best ?

I'm happy if it run games well.
There is other Ryzen CPU models coming too.

But again, wait more benchmarks. After 7.7

[tacoshy]

Originally posted by Bacardi:

Originally posted by tacoshy:

If you look at the benchmark, it barely beats an 9900K at stock settings of 3.6GHz while most 9900K can run 4.8GHz all core and in single core easily higher.

Does it need beat 9900K and to be best of the best ?

I'm happy if it run games well.
There is other Ryzen CPU models coming too.

But again, wait more benchmarks. After 7.7

No but at the same price point as AMD reports indicate it makes no sense to go for the lower performing hardware.

[tacoshy]

Originally posted by Autumn:

Originally posted by tacoshy:

If you look at the benchmark, it barely beats an 9900K at stock settings of 3.6GHz while most 9900K can run 4.8GHz and in single core easily higher.

I don't know how this website does things; does it run at stock clocks? Or does it allow for boosting?

That's the thing. Mostly on stock clocks but often not with the same set that would make it a scientific bench. There so many things to consider as the MoBo, the RAM, driver versions etc.

['Bacardi]

Here one benchs

https://youtu.be/oDVUdpcKZMA