Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
k will have higher stock clocks but the mobo will not allow overclocking
We are in 2019. GTX 1050 and 1050Ti came out in 2016, 3 years ago. They were top of the line (among affordable cards) 3 years ago. Therefore, it is my estimate that my current graphics card (GTX 1660Ti), which came out in February of this year, and is top of the line among affordable cards, will also be obsolete 3 years from now.
In 3 years, the games may have advanced to a degree that I also need to upgrade my CPU. Already, Ready or Not (a successor to the SWAT series) is recommending i5-7600k for their game. That's rather close to the i5-9400 I am having. By the time i5-9400 becomes the "recommended settings", then my CPU will begin to count as slow.
in 3 years you can think about upgrading with new tech out...
With CPU-s it's even worse - take any quad core sandy/ivy bridge CPU and you can play any modern game with it.
New models appear in requirements simply because that's what's possible to buy now (and it would be a pain to test games with all old HW), not because older ones are not enough.
If nothing changes and current extremely slow progress in terms of CPU/GPU performance continues your CPU will be fine for another 10 years or something...
You can't compare recommendations like that. A i5-7600k is a four core CPU, you have a six core. With that said there's about a ~3% difference comparing only four cores of your cpu. Yours comes out on top if it wasn't obvious. As I mentioned, unless you have money burning a hole in your pocket, there's no reason to upgrade. Wait until the new consoles come out, wait a year for optimizations to buff out and see how well PCs handle the ports. If your PC isn't getting the desired frames you want anymore, then you should upgrade.
@OP: Be warned about used 9900’s. They’re in short supply brand new, and there are a lot of fakes floating around. My workplace’s incident with the fake 9900’s that turned out to be Celeron processors should serve as a warning.
It's just common sense... There are far too few reasons to be selling a 9900K/KF/KS when it's the most powerful CPU that Intel has to offer to mainstream consumers.
At that point you're literally better off buying a 3900X (or 3950X), or even any of the upcoming TRX40 HEDT chips. I wouldn't even take the chance buying second hand because most of the time it's just going to be a fake.