Ryzen 5 1600 or intel i3 9100f

[Flow]

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i3-9100F-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1600/m796379vs3919 like i see here 9100f is better for gaming also in some games 9100f look like giving more fps https://youtu.be/TQHLd_XkNEo idk which one is better

[Bad 💀 Motha]

Why not 2600?
1600 is way too old.
I3 are way too slow.

Let us know your budget, currency and country.

[Flow]

Originally posted by Bad 💀 Motha:

Why not 2600?
1600 is way too old.
I3 are way too slow.

Let us know your budget, currency and country.

Well i can buy 1 of these cpu with my budget so

[r.linder]

Originally posted by Bad 💀 Motha:

Why not 2600?
1600 is way too old.
I3 are way too slow.

Let us know your budget, currency and country.

I've been down this road with him before several times. For some reason he's deadset on looking at the i3-9100F despite several people telling him how awful it is.

[Flow]

Check the links .... above that why i think 9100f is better but im not sure

[r.linder]

Originally posted by Flow:

Check the links .... above that why i think 9100f is better but im not sure

There's no competition, and the FPS comparisons prove that. I don't see how you think the 9100F is better when it's 50% slower in some of the titles, only pulling ahead by a small margin in titles that aren't that CPU heavy. Though in more dense areas of GTA V, the 9100F slows down while the 1600 barely flinches.

UserBenchmark is also based on averages and is not 100% accurate by any means. Take everything from that site with a grain of salt.

Also:

1. The 9100F has only 4 cores and 4 threads with no hyperthreading, which is a dying standard. It's not going to be any good in 2 years, and quite frankly, it's not even good now. The 1600 is the go-to budget CPU if the 2600 is too expensive.

2. The 1600 is a 6 core 12 thread chip and will last longer. Games that benefit from 6 cores will also perform better with the 1600.

3. The only reason the 9100F pulls ahead in less CPU heavy titles is because of higher base clock and single-threaded IPC. 2nd and 3rd gen stomps the 9100F.

4. The 1600 doesn't require an expensive motherboard to overclock, while the 9100F can't be overclocked at all.

5. The one good feature of i3s is the integrated graphics. It was stupid of Intel to release a SKU without an iGPU just because it might appeal to frugal gamers that have no clue what mistake they're making.

[_I_]

i3 isnt slow, just short on cores/threads and not unlocked

save up for intel k or ryzen 2600+

[Bad 💀 Motha]

Just save up more.

No point stooping too low

[Flow]

Originally posted by Bad 💀 Motha:

Just save up more.

No point stooping too low

Well i cant go to more higt price

[r.linder]

Originally posted by Flow:

Originally posted by Bad 💀 Motha:

Just save up more.

No point stooping too low

Well i cant go to more higt price

Yes you can, you just save for a longer period of time, it's not difficult

[Flow]

Originally posted by Escorve:

Originally posted by Flow:

Well i cant go to more higt price

Yes you can, you just save for a longer period of time, it's not difficult

Well ♥♥♥♥ i dont have job to

[r.linder]

Originally posted by Flow:

Originally posted by Escorve:

Yes you can, you just save for a longer period of time, it's not difficult

Well ♥♥♥♥ i dont have job to

Then you shouldn't be buying things like this if you don't have stable income.

[Bad 💀 Motha]

How you gonna buy games?

[Flow]

Btw i dont wanna higt end pc.

[r.linder]

Originally posted by Flow:

Btw i dont wanna higt end pc.

1600 is entry level Ryzen in 2019. 2600 and 3600 are the standard/mid-range.

[Bad 💀 Motha]

We realize that. We're trying to have you not buy junk though.