安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Also, the whole post is about CPU but you said it's running hot in Quake 2 RTX. Quake 2 can't possibly put any load on a modern CPU.
using hwinfo64, what kind of temps and voltages are you getting while idle? do you see the voltage and frequency fluctuate?
what about temps and voltage when you run cinebench?
Last time I read about this issue, the Steam client was settings the Windows system clock granularity to 1ms from its default of 16ms. Ryzen interprets this as a sign that a power hungry application is running and boosts up to max. Fancy mouse and keyboard apps, case LED apps, some monitoring tools, probably that Asrock tuner app do the same, so turn that all off and use Ryzen Master or CPU-Z to monitor (but not both at the same time).
Go into uefi and turn precision boost and XFR back on, and change cool and quiet from auto to on. It helps some people. If you get good idle temps try starting the Steam client. If it shoots up and stays there, just close Steam when you aren't playing games.
I'm on X470 (original revision of the AORUS Gaming 7 WIFI) and I have little issues reaching 4.5~4.6 GHz with PBO, but voltages are still a bit high.
You also have to consider that the 3900X has a lot more packed into that small die, they essentially took a Threadripper's power and put it into the same chip size as the other Ryzen CPUs.
ASRock isn't that bad, actually. The X470 Taichi was pretty popular.
asrock x570 phantom gaming 4
that is one of the worst board across the entire x570 boards from all manufacturers.
I wouldn't be surprised if that board give up in several years time.
Simply put, ASRock is only really good if you dump more money on them. They cheap out the most with cheaper boards, but they're generally able to keep up in the mid to higher end
With asrock taichi you're basically paying $100 extra just for extra m.2 slots, different audio chip, post code led, wifi and the likes.
Asrock x570 gaming 4 on the other hand, is a bottom tier board. I don't know how much it's cost but I know that people would be far better of buying Asus tuf or gigabyte elite, especially if they have the money to pair it with a 3900x.
Have you lowered your cpu voltage? Do so asap, also your motherboard may be okay as long as you don't continuously use your cpu for high intensity workload (near 100% total cpu usage) in a long period.
https://youtu.be/_7PkZwY9PWM
So you see there are chances that your board is as bad as that msi board that was being compared there or worse, I don't know since there isn't any review yet for X570 phantom gaming 4 from reputable source that I know.
What we do know however is that x570 phantom gaming 4 is supposedly cheaper and worse than x570 steel legend, that's for sure so it's kinda guaranteed that your board is worse than steel legend that was being depicted there.
That's why I told you to lower your voltage and don't push the cpu in long time heavy workload too often. You can do that but don't be surprised about the long term reliability of that board if you done that