Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Second, do you have any idea how much an NV-Link bridge costs?
And if you had that kind of money, go do a new build with x570 motherboard and 3900x first
You're also on a 60hz Display, and a small one.
2. people play on 4k 60 fps with rtx 2080 ti
3. ray tracing is still crap
4. wait if you think rtx 2080 ti is too weak
A single RTX, even a 2060 Super would run circles around that old gtx 970
But since your aim would be 1440p, then I'd suggest 2070 or 2080 Super
You don't need 2x RTX cards, lol
How many times do you need to be told by 99% of the HW&OS Sub-forum?
1. Your CPU is not good enough for even a single 2080 Ti.
2. 2080 Ti SLI will run like garbage on your system. Nor is SLI worth it, as the performance gain over one card is barely 30%. It's a fact that SLI is a waste because of the horrible support and bandwidth limitation, as well as the cost. When RTX 3000 releases in ~2 years, a single 3080 Ti would be vastly better than 2x 2080 Ti across the board because SLI is not a guaranteed boost in performance, and it would cost half as much as doing SLI. SLI is rarely ever consistent, as some games will run better with SLI while others run worse than with a single card and requires it to be disabled when playing that game.
3. You do not need more than a 2060 Super or RX 5700 for 1440p 60Hz. A 2080 Ti would be a complete waste on that monitor because it can pull 144+ easily at 1440p. 60 Hz also looks like crap in comparison to 61+.
4. Raytracing is still too new, less than a handful of games actually support it, and the ones that do require settings tweaks otherwise it'll run like ♥♥♥♥, even on a 2080 Ti. You don't need it, and in most of the DXR supported titles, there's barely a difference.
5. They aren't going to make more than a 30% improvement at best because AMD can't beat them. There's no point in making a big change when they have no competition. They'll make another ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ refresh that's barely better and people will buy them anyway because of their new-found philosophy of "build it and they will come."
For 1440p 60 it definitely is good enough... but so is an RTX 2060 Super or 2070. That was the point; there's no point in getting a GPU that costs 3 times as much as one that can get pretty much the same result on his current monitor.
Also ray teaching is an immature technology, it isn't the meat and potatoes you make a purchase decision on, it's gravy.
While not the best cpu, sure it would be fine for any single gpu you put along side it, especially for 1440p/60
I ask now because most AAA tiles are getting support. When i asked again about 6 months they dfidnt have annnounced so many games with ray tracing support.