Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Windows Defender Credential Guard performance
This user is saying in benchmarck 7th processors performance decrease by 8% +- and 5/6 th gen 30% +-
All gens processors if spectre and meltdown mitigations are disabled, get half performance decrease.
That's sad mitigations spectre meltdown, + hvci, impact performance that much, it would be cool if 7th gen would have only 4% perf decrease, with hvci.
I'm trolling:
troll on / Spectre and meltdown, was a conspiracy to make us buy better performances hardware + hvci enabled by default on new w10 install with non 7th gen processors. / troll off
Extremer
<<We had major performance issues. After quite a long case with Microsoft, we conclusively narrowed it down to HVCI. They claimed they had no documented case of it causing performance issues before but we ran a lot of different tests with a PFE onsite and had the same results on a clean Windows image.
Most of our machines had 5-6th gen Intel CPUs which suffered about a 30% decrease in performance benchmarks (strangely enough 2D graphics and memory performance were impacted, CPU/disk/3D not so much), running only CG is about a 5% decrease. Running HVCI on 8th gen has only a ~8% performance impact. Another interesting find - if you rollback the Spectre BIOS patch, the performance hit is halved on 5/6th gen.
I think it's ridiculous Microsoft still do not have any official post about this. We had our case opened in June and got it escalated quite high and even the top performance experts claimed HVCI should not have an impact on performance. Yet, the in the video from the Borec article they say without MBEC (added in 7th gen), it would have a big performance impact..>>
Anyway i tryed just for the fun, a bios with speculative disabled, + reg file hex 3 value instead of 400,
CPuZ reached 470 max single core, and 1850 multicore after few trys.
I enabled the ubu tool bios with speculative patched ( disabled) + enabled with reg the os patch.
I have hard time to reach 1810 score multi and 461 is max single core score.
It's actually sitting @ 1760 most of the time and 456 one core
So on Haswell, there is a little decrease of performance.
It's not much, but if i enable this time memory integrity, i loose 50 points on multicore score, and single core score ( i dunno single score loss i forgot it )
I think i really wanna enable memory integrity, it worked fine with everry games, minus stalink that doesn't support hyperv isolation.
Maybe it's time to buy a new motherboard, cpu and ram.
The loss wityhout MBEC on, would be too much.
I get 470 single core perf and 1852 max score.
Also i had kone + military mouse having cursor freezing every two minutes, and the freeze is gone.
it's possible the patch is not the fixer, but installing old bios and putting moded bios back did fix something.
I would be not surprised, as one day i had negative temperature in bios and windows , of -38@ idle, that happend from nowhere on z87-plus, resetting to default, or cutting down power for 10 minutes, and even removing the cmos battery, or doing cmos reset, didn't fix the negative temp issue.
Flashing again the bios with the same version, unlocked positive temp instead of negative.
This is where i'm thinking bios / uefi, can corrupt by itself, as some bug may happen, when changing some value, i would not been surprised at all.