Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
Yes at 1080p, many games will rely on a strong cpu, especially if trying to crank out those higher frames, such as at 1080p or 1440p @ 144+ hz
Your current gpu is already very good for 1080p/144 though.
If you got an i7 class of cpu, then I'd look at 1080 Ti or RTX 2070 if you wanted a better performance gpu that would hold you over for many more years to come.
6th and 7th gen i7 aren't that power hungry really, only if you do a heavy OC will that really impact better PSU needs.
the i5s from generation 3 - 7 are pretty much mediocre difference so there are chances your GPU is gonna get bottlenecked by the CPU.
Unless if you're going for a higher class GPU like 2070 or a 1080, then I would suggest going for a new motherboard and CPU like a B450 and Ryzen 3600 to unleash more power from the GPUs. If not, yea GPUs can get bottlenecked a lot by CPU
my workplace has i5-7400s and they get heavily bottlenecked and caused the GTX 1080 Tis to not perform at maximum. Had to go for like a 8400 6 core at least to really see the 1080 Ti deliver more frames.
It's not much, but it does help.
And, bottleneck depends on the workload; you could have a dual core with higher clock, and a 16 core CPU with lower clock (assuming IPC is the same), if you're playing something like CSGO, the dual core would perform better, because it's faster, because you can't use the extra cores, because the game won't see them. And the 16 core would bottleneck the GPU more, because the few cores it does use, are running slower.
That's the beauty of AMD Ryzen. Actually amazing CPUs for a more affordable price, which defeats the point of going with Intel for the vast majority of users, because you get very respectable performance for less.
These days, Intel's chips for consumers are becoming more about ego due to the 9700K and 9900K being the best CPUs available for professional gamers. Not like they have a choice, because AMD keeps beating the crap out of their value below that mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbi_-08CMN0 I wouldn't say considerably. They're pretty close in a lot of games.