Todas as discussões > Fóruns Steam > Hardware and Operating Systems > Detalhes do tópico
Zireth 30/set./2019 às 8:37
[Resolved]Is a RTX 2080 enough for 1440p 144hz?
Hello, I am going to be considering upgrades to jump to 1440p, will a RTX 2080 to do 1440p 144hz on most games?
Última edição por Zireth; 2/out./2019 às 11:53
O autor do tópico escolheu uma mensagem como a resposta da sua dúvida.
Clique aqui para ir direto para a resposta.
Escrito originalmente por Autumn_:
I would grab a 2080 Super, since it's slightly better in performance, but the same price.

But yeah, the 2080 should be fine for 1440p144hz at high/ultra settings.
< >
Exibindo comentários 46–60 de 67
dOBER 7/out./2019 às 16:13 
Escrito originalmente por SHREDDER:
No i dont have an obsession with 144 fps if i wanted 60 fps i would had graohics on high or medium but because i want the best graphics i keep them on ultra for as long as it run at 30 or more fps.
30 or more :D some peoples expectations are low. 30 would be horrible even for games like anno.. slideshow as its finest and then we have many games which breaks 3.5gb vram by far on 1440p which makes it even worse. But hey ultra settings is more important then decent frames !
#46
Bad 💀 Motha 7/out./2019 às 19:05 
For many games, regardless of the res/refresh you want around 6gb vram minimum if you plan on doing Ultra settings in some of the more demanding games. You also want at least 16gb system ram too.
#47
Zireth 7/out./2019 às 19:11 
Escrito originalmente por Bad 💀 Motha:
For many games, regardless of the res/refresh you want around 6gb vram minimum if you plan on doing Ultra settings in some of the more demanding games. You also want at least 16gb system ram too.
I have currently one with 8gb of Vram and 16gb of ram because that's what someone told me long ago when I was first building when Skylake and the 10 series was the top configuration, and no one could ever get a smooth 60fps on 4k
Última edição por Zireth; 7/out./2019 às 19:11
#48
Bad 💀 Motha 8/out./2019 às 11:55 
If you can't afford a 2080 Ti for 4K, then better off going 2080 Super and run via a decent 1440p Display that can handle 144 or higher refresh.
#49
Zireth 8/out./2019 às 12:04 
Escrito originalmente por Bad 💀 Motha:
If you can't afford a 2080 Ti for 4K, then better off going 2080 Super and run via a decent 1440p Display that can handle 144 or higher refresh.
Oh no, I was just remincing about the old days on how even with two 1080s you could barely do 4K 60fps now a RTX 2080TI could do that easily.
#50
Bad 💀 Motha 8/out./2019 às 12:07 
Yea I had no issues running many games well enough on a single 980 Ti or 1080 Ti, but yea SLI was also very trouble-some sometimes. 1080 was just never good enough.
#51
SeriousCCIE 8/out./2019 às 13:02 
I was fondly thinking back to 2009 when my 4850x2 was able to run 2560x1600 for some games of the era, but not all. Mostly I ran things at 1680x1050 at max...1920x1200 worked without issues on many games between 2008-2010 as well.

It's like when directx 11 came out, performance just fell into a hole.
#52
Bad 💀 Motha 8/out./2019 às 13:09 
Escrito originalmente por SeriousCCIE:
It's like when directx 11 came out, performance just fell into a hole.

DX 10 was the real performance killer with gpus. DX 11 actually helped quite a bit, doing what DX 10/10.1 could do and more and while doing more being less stressing on the gpu compared to DX 10. But yes, obviously comparing anything DX10 or higher was more stressful then DX9, but that was to be expected to pull off all the visual enhancements.

But yea 4850 probably just wasn't a good choice, as the xx50 or x50 amd gpus always were near the lower end spectrum of gpu performance for that entire family. With xx70 or x70 being midrange and xx80, x80, xx90, x90 being on the higher end.
Última edição por Bad 💀 Motha; 8/out./2019 às 13:11
#53
SHREDDER 9/out./2019 às 5:09 
Escrito originalmente por dOBER:
Escrito originalmente por SHREDDER:
No i dont have an obsession with 144 fps if i wanted 60 fps i would had graohics on high or medium but because i want the best graphics i keep them on ultra for as long as it run at 30 or more fps.
30 or more :D some peoples expectations are low. 30 would be horrible even for games like anno.. slideshow as its finest and then we have many games which breaks 3.5gb vram by far on 1440p which makes it even worse. But hey ultra settings is more important then decent frames !
yes i dont see any difference betwen 60 fps and 30. Iam waiting until better graphics cards release that will be able to run max settings 1440p and max ray tracing . Only then i will upgrade. Many people say that intel will soon bring the revolution on graphics cards with their XE graphics cards and save us fom Nvidia. Let see what will happen.
#54
tacoshy 9/out./2019 às 5:54 
Escrito originalmente por SHREDDER:
Many people say that intel will soon bring the revolution on graphics cards with their XE graphics cards and save us fom Nvidia. Let see what will happen.

Which proberly end like Intel project Larabee... for the evry same reason. Not so many ppl say that because it proberly going to be Larabeee 2.0

And Intel already confirmed that they will target the more profiting server or data center audience. barely good for gaming in that case.
#55
Monk 9/out./2019 às 6:00 
Yeah I don't see why Intel would try to get involved in the consumer gpu market really, its a small market, with relitivly small margins that is hyper competitive, when they can simply focus on the server market which they already have a huge dominating presence in.
#56
_I_ 9/out./2019 às 6:27 
some newer intel cpus have amd igp
intel has made huge leaps since the gma days, but still cant handle 1080p gaming at mid+ settings
i highly doubt they will every make any any mid+ grade gpus for gaming

if you want a good gpu, you can get a cheap nvidia or amd dedicated card
#57
dOBER 9/out./2019 às 11:03 
Escrito originalmente por SHREDDER:
Escrito originalmente por dOBER:
30 or more :D some peoples expectations are low. 30 would be horrible even for games like anno.. slideshow as its finest and then we have many games which breaks 3.5gb vram by far on 1440p which makes it even worse. But hey ultra settings is more important then decent frames !
yes i dont see any difference betwen 60 fps and 30. Iam waiting until better graphics cards release that will be able to run max settings 1440p and max ray tracing . Only then i will upgrade.

someting must be wrong with your eyes. btw you wait on what ? there are not even a handfiull of games which supports dlls and rtx ! battlefield 5 which supports both can be played with only a 2080 (no super and no ti) 1440p max settings dlls + dxr on 60fps ! so what do you need more if you need only 30fps ? wait for stronger gpus which are able to pump out 144fps which you dont see ? makes no sense

https://youtu.be/r98eRu2SoNI

i mean its even possible to play on 4k max settings dlls +dxr with a 2080ti

https://youtu.be/amlr4nlWAr8
Última edição por dOBER; 9/out./2019 às 11:10
#58
SHREDDER 9/out./2019 às 11:59 
Escrito originalmente por dOBER:
Escrito originalmente por SHREDDER:
yes i dont see any difference betwen 60 fps and 30. Iam waiting until better graphics cards release that will be able to run max settings 1440p and max ray tracing . Only then i will upgrade.

someting must be wrong with your eyes. btw you wait on what ? there are not even a handfiull of games which supports dlls and rtx ! battlefield 5 which supports both can be played with only a 2080 (no super and no ti) 1440p max settings dlls + dxr on 60fps ! so what do you need more if you need only 30fps ? wait for stronger gpus which are able to pump out 144fps which you dont see ? makes no sense

https://youtu.be/r98eRu2SoNI

i mean its even possible to play on 4k max settings dlls +dxr with a 2080ti

https://youtu.be/amlr4nlWAr8
See? You pay 1200 euros for a card and you still need to use DLSS! That why we must wait for better cards. To run reak 1440p max settings with max ray tracing without the need of DLSS.
#59
dOBER 9/out./2019 às 12:57 
Escrito originalmente por SHREDDER:
Escrito originalmente por dOBER:

someting must be wrong with your eyes. btw you wait on what ? there are not even a handfiull of games which supports dlls and rtx ! battlefield 5 which supports both can be played with only a 2080 (no super and no ti) 1440p max settings dlss + dxr on 60fps ! so what do you need more if you need only 30fps ? wait for stronger gpus which are able to pump out 144fps which you dont see ? makes no sense

https://youtu.be/r98eRu2SoNI

i mean its even possible to play on 4k max settings dlss +dxr with a 2080ti

https://youtu.be/amlr4nlWAr8
See? You pay 1200 euros for a card and you still need to use DLSS! That why we must wait for better cards. To run reak 1440p max settings with max ray tracing without the need of DLSS.
ah its not about fps... its about money. you want it cheaper :) its also explains why you bought an old 60hz monitor and say you cant see any diffrence between 30 and 60fps with your 970.

the truth looks different. if you had an 144hz+ monitor and you would play for some times on it and then you would go back even 60fps looks stuttering mess. same thing with 1440p, you cant go back to 1080p because it looks like pixel mincraft compare to 1440p
Última edição por dOBER; 9/out./2019 às 13:02
#60
< >
Exibindo comentários 46–60 de 67
Por página: 1530 50

Todas as discussões > Fóruns Steam > Hardware and Operating Systems > Detalhes do tópico
Publicado em: 30/set./2019 às 8:37
Mensagens: 67
Iniciar uma nova discussão

Regras e diretrizes para discussões