安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Nvidia TITAN V is 20-30% faster than GTX 1080 Ti, Benchmarks and buying Link below-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1zmKdNGWvE&t=65s
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/titan/titan-v/
may want to try a more legit reviewer, one that doesnt have to resort to playing music during the whole thing :/
Thats true
can still be used as one though
Both are Nvidia products, No one will gain anything by tempering those benchmarks.
Trusted reviewing source is important when comparing 2 different brands, Like AMD vs Nvidia,
or AMD vs INTEL.
To avoid bias judgement.
While I had this card and it was really a good GPU (had like 10 thermal sensors for every spot), you have to be stupid to pay $1200 for it. That's overpricing at its finest.
As for the so called "binning" process, it doesn't matter if you're going to OC the GPU yourself. A FTW3 might OC more than a Kingpin or the other way around. It's a luck of the draw. Just because one card is clocked more than the other over stock clocks doesn't mean it will OC more. Only a fool would believe in that.
Out of the air cooled cards, I like Galax HOF the most due to its white PCB and rigid VRM. Out of the others, Gigabyte Waterforce Xtreme is nice with that 120mm AIO attached to the GPU. They're both expensive though. A more simple Asus Strix is likely all you need.
I agree I got mine a lot cheaper.
Good card.
Having had 7 ftw3 cards be probably got a better idea than most of the sort of variance there is in the 1080ti silicon, disregarding one card that wouldn't hit stock speeds, the other 6 varied from 1950MHz to 2150MHz when overclocked, my final pair seem to be capable of 2076 and 2088MHz under water, on air they struggled to remain above 2000.
That is where the binning can help f you have money to burn, but kingpins are really designed for LN2 and serious tinkering for extreme overclockers and not really gaming.
Are you saying it's like sillicon lottery with CPUs - that one can be lucky to achive way above what is expected?
Of my 5 failed cards I had 1 that hit 2150 and one that bit 2120 but they had faulty memory sadly, one had a dead fan that hit around 2020, one barely hit 1600 and cooked itself and a final one cooked itself but atleadt hit 1950 ish.
With 1080ti, 2000 is average, 2050 is decent 2100 is good 2150 is golden lotto won it seems.
Sweet!
Do you think it's possible to reach these kind of speed with blower fans?
Not a guarentee, true, but it is very likely to get a card over 2ghz. Sounds like you just had bad luck.
Funny how you say Kingpin cards are designed for LN, yet the record holder at just under 2.5ghz used LN on a reference card.
Goes to show that Pascal really doesn't that wide of a performance metric between high binned and bottom barrell.
Yesi had bad luck getting 5 faulty cards, but I suspect most of those issues were a result of the components being swapped from the stock frame to the elites, even then, only the 2 cards that had severe heat issues (as in 90 degrees within minutes) failed to hit 2k, had 2 true winners and a trio of 'good' cards, atleast clock wise.
The reason the kingpins are designed for LN2 and extreme overclocking is the triple bios, uprated components, reinforced PCB, voltage measurement points etc all designed to make it far aside and pointless for those who don't.
No, it doesn't. My reference 1080 Ti EVGA OC'ed more than the FTW3. If it did matter, then the FTW3 would have OC'ed more as it was clocked higher. Look at this:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/GTX_1080_Ti_Xtreme_Gaming/33.html
FE overclocking higher than custom cards. You're spreading nonsense.