Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
GIGABYTE WINDFORCE cooling system do you think is enough to have stability at 2000-2050 mhz?
If you want to overclock, you'll want something more high-end than a Windforce. The MSI Gaming Z and Asus GTX 1060 Strix are the best 1060s for Overclocking. And run the highest stock clocks as well.
Gigabyte cards just aren't as good for Overclocking, Largely because Gigabyte Soldering and PCBs aren't on the same level.
-here there is 60 dollars difference between 3 and 6 gb
-ASUS DUAL-GTX1060-3G is it a good card? I would have 2000-2050 stable mhz, I saw a review who said all gtx 1060 could manage 2000-2050 mhz as oc
You can't directly compare GPUs by the Core/Memory "Mhz" anymore then you can compare say 4Ghz between an Intel and AMD CPU. It doesn't work that way.
Overall, the 1060 3GB are slower, by design of the Core and overall specs; not just because of the VRAM.
Doom (2016) for example; you need 4-5GB VRAM to run it on Nightmare visual settings at 1920x1080
I know several times 3gb are not enough for newest games BUT benchmarks are always on all ULTRA highest AA highest AF, so I was trying to know the impact of VRAM on these settings.
I know 3gb is a slightly slower as a 6gb but 10% is not that much to spend 60 bucks if I will not have issues on VRAM playing like now with bland AA and AF on high settings
FXAA
bland AF (2x or 4x max)
high settings
You want the GPU to actually last "years" then you buy the better one, simple as that.
Buying a GTX 1060 3GB now; it will maybe hold you over for a year, if you are lucky, and depending on what all you want to run.
For most demanding games running at 1080p:
3GB is more for High visuals, no AA.
4GB High visuals w/ some AA
Beyond 4GB and you should be able to do Ultra, and a decent mix of AA.
AF shouldn't be a concern, that should just be on 16X at all times.
Again, look at good benchmarks that compare all of these together side by side so you can really see:
AMD 460, 470, 480 4GB, 480 8GB
NVIDIA 1050, 1050 Ti, 1060 3GB, 1060 6GB
3GB in general IS enough for 1080p, but up to 1440p the 6GB is preferred.
When a GPU doesnt have enough VRAM for a certain game or used graphic settings the PCs Physical RAM gets tapped to help with caching and swapping and what not, which will result in higher RAM usage when playing said game.
Naturally DDR5 is faster than a PCs Physical RAM so its usually best for the GPU to have enough VRAM to handle things. But all in all there should be a minimal impact.
I believe ive run into this specific issue in ARK as my VRAM gets maxed out with only 2GB and RAM usage tends to get pretty high.
-
All in all, the 3GB will suffice if you dont care about maxing every single graphic detail, game benchmarks show there is a small FPS difference between the 3GB and 6GB but the 6GB should be considered just to have some extra VRAM as a buffer.
Ashes of the Singularity for example needs 2GB+ VRAM because there is true line of sight, which this is explained on the games store page. No single game is the same when it comes to VRAM.
But generally, i think 3GB is enough for your purposes, but if you can get the 6GB that'll be somewhat more "future proof" in a sense.