Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
And otherwise you should expect 90-100% on one of them because if it run as fast as it can then it will be close to 100% of course.
Yes lock your FPS to 24 or lower with RivaTuner or yer cpu/gpu will be ded after they become obsolete. Or just don't play games at all so you don't get high cpu/gpu usage.
If you are running Windows 10 try with both game mode on and off. Some games work better with it, some don't, others it doesn't seem to matter. I recently found that after a driver update FO4 uses notably more GPU time with Game mode enabled, which caused problems with video playback in chrome (TV online ,netflix, youtube, etc). Turning it off reduced GPU usage.
I have an AMD Phenom X4 9850 and a HD 6950 2 GB graphics card and I don't remember if it's in Quake Champions or in Overwatch where I've got just 30-32% load on my GPU. That's because at-least one of my CPU cores are at 100% or thereabout limiting the performance which mean that in especially the compeitive 6on6 games I got just about 30 FPS in Overwatch and poor performance in Quake Champions. If I had a processor which would be more capable and I got get more FPS then the load of the graphics card would increase, with stronger and stronger CPU the graphics would get closer and closer to 100% until it hit there.
On the other hand if I had too weak graphics the graphics card would sit at basically 100% whereas the CPU maybe didn't. That's still a better scenario though as long as you don't play at the weakest graphics setting because in that scenario you could decrease the graphics setting to increase the FPS further.
Some games will only do 30 or 60 FPS and if you have a 60 Hz monitor and turn on V-sync without triple buffering to lock it down to 60 FPS or set in-game settings to get that then you can keep both CPU core and GPU load below 100%. Otherwise if you let it run as fast as possible then one of them will run close to 100% and the other at whatever.
Measuring CPU speed get more complicated though because on something like a quad-core i5 nowadays many games will utilize that very effeciently showing close to 100% load on all cores and for the whole processor.
Using something like a Ryzen 7 though with 8 cores and 16 threads chances are it's just one core which sit at 100% and others may not be utilized much at all. Hence there maybe it would say 50% CPU load or so when it calculate for all of them but it's still limited by the one core and thread which hold sit back. Relative say the i7 8700K instead with 6 cores and 12 threads maybe the extra ones didn't helped and that too sit at 100% for one core and thread but mostly because the later can overclock to 5 GHz and the former to 4 GHz the later will run the game at a bit higher frame-rate anyway even if full CPU load there maybe would say 70% instead. Because the one limiting core and thread ran faster.
Performance is pretty good, fps seems to be stable and no major drops.
your good this is a well rounded setup in terms of cpu to gpu performance thats why you see near 100% on both
you should only be concerned if your not getting near max on your gpu
GPU is supposed to run at 99/100%
a CPU running at 100% would normally be a bottleneck.
We cant help you further without knowing your PCs full specs.
I'd say use your PC for all it's worth. It's more likely to become irrelevant by time than you having "used it up", you'd get more value from using it :)
How many PCs break vs how many do people simply feel is to slow and outdated?
It is what it is.
Plus people with Ryzen 7 processors may say "Haha, I've just got 68% processor load whereas the i7 7700K have 98%! Mine is clearly much more future proof since it's got room to spare!" (which may be true) not considering the fact that the i7 7700K may actually be running that game faster because while all four cores was utiilized fully and not all eight cores on the Ryzen the limiting factor, how fast the most heavy task ran, was running faster on the i7 7700K.
Of course for a very well multi-threaded task the Ryzen 7 will be faster. Current games necessarily aren't though.