Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/socketType.html#id16
Motherboard
2. What is your budget.
3. Giving you heads up, Intel coffeelake flagship is supposedly coming out next month, and if it meets within your budget I say the wait is worth it for that.
The FX 8350, or the other FX chips will not fit, or work on FM motherboards, they have to be AM3+, and please stop making things up, that isn't even close to being true, as said before in real world performance in games, a G4560 is good as FX 8350, and G4560 a dual core.
Again the FX 8350 will not work, or fit in a FM motherboard....
ah yeah fm board.. kinda oversaw that..
not making up things though.. these are facts.
Facts you have no clue what you are talking about.
so go for A10 then on an fm board it's not like there is any other/better option.
Yeah, no I won't stop. Because I am absolutely 100% right when I say that it really depends on what you are doing on your PC. If you are just playing games, AMD is cheaper and just as good or even better in some cases. AMD has a better single application performance.
If you plan on running a more complex environment, like video editing, 3d rendering or Virtual machines, then yes intel will be the better choice.
well you are a troll, i don't know if you noticed it..