Gtx 1060 3gb :: Hardware and Operating Systems

모든 토론 > Steam 포럼 > Hardware and Operating Systems > 제목 정보

dominicky 2017년 9월 11일 오후 10시 43분

Gtx 1060 3gb

Amazon.de sells gtx 1060 3gb for 215 euro.
Shall i go for it?

< >

전체 댓글 45개 중 1~15개 표시 중

Bad 💀 Motha 2017년 9월 11일 오후 10시 52분

Thats the normal price now.

Get the 6GB version; 3GB varient 1060s are all slower
and not enough VRAM for moving forward in Gaming.

vadim 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 12분

3GB is enough nowadays.

Bad 💀 Motha 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 17분

How is it enough? Many games you need 4GB+ to do VeryHigh/Ultra settings

vadim 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 22분

Bad_Motha님이 먼저 게시:
Many games you need 4GB+ to do VeryHigh/Ultra settings

Can yoyu name such games, please? With 4GB RAM in recommended settings? Not those which physically use more than 3GB if graphics has them - this shows nothing at all.
1060 3GB has 10% less CUDA cores comparing to 6GB counterpart. So you need to show benchmarks where performance loss at playable settings should be more than this percentage.
In this case, we will be able to say that limited amount of VRAM bottlenecks it performance.
All benchmarks which I saw prove directly opposite.

Bad 💀 Motha 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 37분

Well many game won't let u crank up the graphics beyond a certain point if the GPU is below 4GB VRAM; simple as that really.

It doesn't really make sense to get these GPUs that have below 6 or 8 GB of VRAM anymore; anymore than it makes sense to build a new PC with 8GB of system RAM.

vadim 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 39분

Bad_Motha님이 먼저 게시:
Well many game won't let u crank up the graphics beyond a certain point if the GPU is below 4GB VRAM; simple as that really.

Name them.

shiel 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 39분

vadim님이 먼저 게시:
3GB is enough nowadays.

3GB was borderline back when the 780ti came out... If someone is planning on keeping their gpu for any length of time, it's a poor choice for a new card. While it might be passable at 1080p, there's still games that will suffer for it.

vadim님이 먼저 게시:
Bad_Motha님이 먼저 게시:
Well many game won't let u crank up the graphics beyond a certain point if the GPU is below 4GB VRAM; simple as that really.
Name them.

DOOM off the top of my head.

rotNdude 님이 마지막으로 수정; 2017년 9월 12일 오전 9시 10분

vadim 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 42분

Doom runs fine: https://www.bit-tech.net/reviews/tech/graphics/gigabyte-gtx-1060-windforce-oc-3gb/6/
(I haven't tested that myself)
One more link: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-3gb-vs-6gb-review_6

Bad 💀 Motha 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 42분

Hmm GTAV I use 6GB VRAM, easy, thank you...

DOOM comes to around 5.2GB VRAM

shiel 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 43분

vadim님이 먼저 게시:
Doom runs fine: https://www.bit-tech.net/reviews/tech/graphics/gigabyte-gtx-1060-windforce-oc-3gb/6/
(I haven't tested that myself)
One more link: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-3gb-vs-6gb-review_6

IIRC you have to fiddle around a bit to get a 970(which is technically 4gb) to run at nightmare settings. Will the game run with a 3gb card maxed out? Sure. Might get some annoying effects though (textures filling in as you spin around for example).

shiel 님이 마지막으로 수정; 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 44분

#10

Bad 💀 Motha 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 45분

Very High in DOOM = roughly 3.5-4GB
Nightmware (Doom's Ultra setting) asks for 5GB+ which it easily will use, for sure.

And this is at 1080p BTW

#11

shiel 2017년 9월 11일 오후 11시 46분

Bad_Motha님이 먼저 게시:
Very High in DOOM = roughly 3.5-4GB
Nightmware (Doom's Ultra setting) asks for 5GB+ which it easily will use, for sure.

And this is at 1080p BTW

Interestingly it doesn't use very much more at 1440p. I thought that was a little strange when I upgraded.

#12