Which is the fastest Ryzen 3 processor and what is its FX equivalent?

全スレッド > Steam 掲示板 > Hardware and Operating Systems > トピックの詳細

erratic_gamer (禁止済) 2017年8月3日 9時14分

< >

16-21 / 21 のコメントを表示

Hello Kitty 2017年8月3日 12時39分

Kalsolette の投稿を引用：
tacoshy の投稿を引用：

fx9xxx as good as an i7? highly doubt it... you know, just because it haws same GHz doesnt mean they are same strong...

No, because the benchmarks that matched it mostly. Certain games like Skyrim ran way better on Intel though.

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-4770K-vs-AMD-FX-9590/1537vs1812

still want to argue about it? it doesnt even beats it in multicore application because FX archtecture is simliar to HT 4c/8t. And in games thanks to optimization and other problems it didnt even come close...

#16

vadim 2017年8月3日 12時40分

To be honest, overclockability doesn't make any difference.
(you cannot overclock it enough to be on par with i3 with cheap cooler and if you want to buy super cooler, it would be cheaper to buy lowest i5 which will be faster than any Ryzen 3 in all cases)
And Ryzen 3 obviously has worse price/performance ratio than i3. Even much worse. Ryzen 1200 costs the same as i3 7100 (!!!).
But customer should be complete no-brainer to choose this AMD CPU over i3. Ryzen 3 useless for gaming, because its too slow and useless for office PCs because it has no graphic core.
But, as I said, almost nobody also needs i3.

#17

Mossy Snake 2017年8月3日 12時44分

vadim の投稿を引用：
To be honest, overclockability doesn't make any difference.
(you cannot overclock it enough to be on par with i3 with cheap cooler and if you want to buy super cooler, it would be cheaper to buy lowest i5 which will be faster than any Ryzen 3 in all cases)
And Ryzen 3 obviously has worse price/performance ratio than i3. Even much worse. Ryzen 1200 costs the same as i3 7100 (!!!).
But customer should be complete no-brainer to choose this AMD CPU over i3. Ryzen 3 useless for gaming, because its too slow and useless for office PCs because it has no graphic core.
But, as I said, almost nobody also needs i3.

The Wraith Stealth is very good. I've heard of people OCing the 1200 to 3.7Ghz without any issues, in which case it likely beats an i3.

#18

Astraea Kisaragi 2017年8月3日 12時54分

Kill i3, make i5 low end, make i7 medium end, make i9 flagship - sounds like a plan.

But yeah Ryzen costs more as I expected, especially when I take it has no graphics core. Im a Geforce girl, but would have liked a Radeon integrated backup - just in case anything happens.
Plus you need expensive mobos and memory to Ryzen so that adds even more to costs. Lets say directly - A320 is so gimped that is not even funny. While by Intel you can put i7 to cheapest mobo.

#19

vadim 2017年8月3日 12時57分

MossyRathalos の投稿を引用：
The Wraith Stealth is very good. I've heard of people OCing the 1200 to 3.7Ghz without any issues, in which case it likely beats an i3.

i3 7100 has 3.9GHz clockrate and significally better IPC, so I doubt that even highly overclocked Ryzen 1200 could compete with i3 despite having more physical cores.
Indeed, Ryzen @ 3.7 GHz is relatively equal to Ryzen 1300X @ stock speed and we know that 1300X is slower in the games.
And I'm not sure about 3.7GHz with stock cooler. To be precise, I highly doubt.
But overclockers wrote they were able to reach 3.9GHz with Noctua. Try to calculate cost of Ryzen 3+Noctua combo and you will get i3 performance for i5 cost. Not a very attractive deal.