Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
We don't know for sure because Ryzen 3 just released today.
Espacially the X CPU from ryzen have a terrible TDP which means a non-X can be way higherOC'ed and then outperform an OC'ed X CPU.
Espacially considering the price with the cost of the MoBo its not worth it imo. At low budget Intel is still unquestionably king.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoR0RDETGZI
Ryzen 3 places well when overclocked, depending on what the retail price settles at it could be good'ish but I believe the 1600 is still the best bang for the $ cpu.
the question is then, is the bottleneck bad enough to make the games unejoyable? i don't think so. i have a 1400 and it does fine.
1400 has SMT. Some games like GTA V loves SMT/HT even if it's quadcore only.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11658/the-amd-ryzen-3-1300x-ryzen-3-1200-cpu-review/15
Here, the 1400/1500X beat both Ryzen 3 and i5 non k because of SMT
No Op it will not bottleneck