Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-3GB-vs-AMD-RX-470/3646vs3640
Personally, i'd get the 1060 6GB, which is more future proof.
It's also quite a lot faster, almost twice as fast as a 960.
You will not be able to play some future game at ultra settings, but neither RX 470 nor GTX 1060 3GB (no even GTX 1060 6GB/R9 Fury X) will not have enough power to run these games at max settings and acceptable framerate. You will simply run at "very high" in the future. No big deal.
I know lots of people say the 6 GB version but I haven't really seen the benchmarks which make them right.
RX 480 and GTX 1060 is closer now than before but you say the 470 .. I don't know. 470 over 1050Ti at-least.
Only just, and only in DX11 games. DX12 is the future, and the RX 480 is around 15 to 25% faster, which is quite a bit.
I agree ^.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review-9.html
Rx480 has six wins out of 8 games in Vulkan/DX12 significantly more than the 1060 6GB that only manages 2 wins out of 8 games ^.