Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
the thing is, the MB I want to use, the Z170 A PRO, is a fairly cheap ATX, e.g. have no intentions for overclocking, will it hinder it though if I get more demanding RAM? It says it supports it, but I dont want to go too harsh on a £90 motherboard
Watch this video as this will explain about speeds, and timing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-TWQ0rS-SI
If you are using an H110 or B150 etc. get whatever is cheaper.
it makes a difference in i5 or i3 systems, i7 or i5 k overclocked not so much basically helps when cpu cant keep up
but in most cases the difference is so small, its not worth talking about.
fallout 4 is one of them
https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/483824-fallout-4-fps-might-depend-on-your-ram-speed/
http://www.gamespot.com/forums/pc-mac-linux-society-1000004/fallout-4-ridiculusly-high-performance-gained-by-f-32754964/
http://wccftech.com/fallout-4-performance-heavily-influenced-by-ram-speed-according-to-report/
even GTA 5 up to 10 fps faster with fast ram
http://gtaforums.com/topic/790077-ram-speed-affect-fps/
fast ram only shines when you start having CPU bottlenecks other wise difference is so small, its not worth talking about.
i went with DDR4 3200mhz cas14 32 gigs....it was cheep....and i like running 16gigs ramcache with my HDDs and ill know ram well never be a problem on my PC
see this video
https://youtu.be/Er_Fuz54U0Y
What I've been doing for customers is recommending the 2400 RAM for those using cheaper boards; since 2133 is somewhat scarce already, and I have a hard time getting a better price on 2133 vs 2400. Then run this ram at 2133, which works just fine. For those doing a build around a Z170/Z270 board, then I would just grab 3200 RAM
Slightly off-topic, but I have a Z170 and I'm looking to upgrade my RAM. With 3200 does CL make much of a difference to anything? Other than price?
this well teal you every thing to know about CL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAS_latency
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WsfeuWI7mU
Overall its not a huge difference, but it does impact speeds a bit.
So for example, this is how RAM speed typically stacks up (the last #, higher is better, this is achieved with a lower CAS Timing)
2133 @ CAS 14 = 152
2133 @ CAS 15 = 142
2400 @ CAS 14 = 171
3000 @ CAS 15 = 200
3200 @ CAS 16 = 200
The last # there is a representation of speed (in theory)
So as you can see, there is very little difference if at all, between 3000 vs 3200 Mhz when comparing ones with that Mhz and CAS Timing.
Going by pricing however, the better bang for buck at the moment is:
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series (2x 8GB) DDR4, 3000/CL15
at right around 90-95 $USD
Thanks for the information. That's actually the kit I was most closely looking at.
Others to look closely at are Kingston FuryX and Corsair Vengeance LPX or LED
If you need quality, but cheap RAM for say a B150 Chipset, Kingston FuryX 2400 is pretty much your best bet. But yes, for Z170/Z270 Chipset, it's well worth it to get RAM around the 3000/3200 range, as the increase in price is very little actually when you compare all DDR4 that is available.
RAM becomes faster as speed increases, but as speed increases, it's expected for the latency to increase as well. That's the rule of the thumb.