what processor and motherboard paired with rx 470 wil give me 60 fps with graohics maxed

[Bobmac]

looking for a processor and motherboard that will give me 60+ fps with settings maxed out on rust. thanks

[dominicky]

Look for an ryzen 5 processor Or 7

[Bobmac]

Escrito originalmente por dominicky:

Or 7

ok cheers

[SoldierScar]

A locked i5-7xxx series processor or ryzen 1500/1600 should be fine with that gpu, you still most likely won't get 60+ fps in maxed out rust with that gpu.

[Bobmac]

Escrito originalmente por SoldierScar:

A locked i5-7xxx series processor or ryzen 1500/1600 should be fine with that gpu, you still most likely won't get 60+ fps in maxed out rust with that gpu.

have seen videos of people with i5 6600 and rx 470 getting 60fps. am looking into the ryzen 1500 though thanks

[SoldierScar]

Escrito originalmente por bobmac:

Escrito originalmente por SoldierScar:

A locked i5-7xxx series processor or ryzen 1500/1600 should be fine with that gpu, you still most likely won't get 60+ fps in maxed out rust with that gpu.

have seen videos of people with i5 6600 and rx 470 getting 60fps. am looking into the ryzen 1500 though thanks

Well maybe they improved the optimization, last time i played it was one year ago with my i5-6600 and GTX1060 (which is better) and fps was around 55-60 (not sure if fully maxed out, i forgot).

[Aliquis Freedom & Ethnopluralism]

Escrito originalmente por bobmac:

Escrito originalmente por SoldierScar:

A locked i5-7xxx series processor or ryzen 1500/1600 should be fine with that gpu, you still most likely won't get 60+ fps in maxed out rust with that gpu.

have seen videos of people with i5 6600 and rx 470 getting 60fps. am looking into the ryzen 1500 though thanks

Get the 1600 instead of the 1500, price difference is so small.
Overclocked it will likely hold up to 7400 or 7500 but have cores to spare, the 7600K may do better in gamesbut vs the 1600 it also cost more and doesn't come with a cooler and if you compare them straight up the 1600/1600X still have two more cores.
How they perform in Rust I don't know.

[Bobmac]

Escrito originalmente por Etnopluralism / Aliquis:

Escrito originalmente por bobmac:

have seen videos of people with i5 6600 and rx 470 getting 60fps. am looking into the ryzen 1500 though thanks

Get the 1600 instead of the 1500, price difference is so small.
Overclocked it will likely hold up to 7400 or 7500 but have cores to spare, the 7600K may do better in gamesbut vs the 1600 it also cost more and doesn't come with a cooler and if you compare them straight up the 1600/1600X still have two more cores.
How they perform in Rust I don't know.

thanks.Do you think the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 and a MSI B350M GAMING PRO AM4 Micro-ATX Motherboard would do the job

Escrito originalmente por SoldierScar:

Escrito originalmente por bobmac:

have seen videos of people with i5 6600 and rx 470 getting 60fps. am looking into the ryzen 1500 though thanks

Well maybe they improved the optimization, last time i played it was one year ago with my i5-6600 and GTX1060 (which is better) and fps was around 55-60 (not sure if fully maxed out, i forgot).

do you think if i got a AMD Ryzen 5 1600 it would make up for the graphics card and push me to 60 fps ? also what do you think i would roughly get on csgo with the ryzen and rx 470

[ILKA]

Escrito originalmente por bobmac:

Escrito originalmente por dominicky:

Or 7

ok cheers

you could try an I5 7500, it beats the R5 1500X on most tests (in gaming)

[Mossy Snake]

Escrito originalmente por ILKA:

Escrito originalmente por bobmac:

ok cheers

you could try an I5 7500, it beats the R5 1500X on most tests (in gaming)

I see them being neck and neck, with the 1500X having better minimums.
(Hardwarecanucks, Blunty, and Paul's Hardware are my sources)

[SoldierScar]

Escrito originalmente por bobmac:

Escrito originalmente por SoldierScar:

Well maybe they improved the optimization, last time i played it was one year ago with my i5-6600 and GTX1060 (which is better) and fps was around 55-60 (not sure if fully maxed out, i forgot).

do you think if i got a AMD Ryzen 5 1600 it would make up for the graphics card and push me to 60 fps ? also what do you think i would roughly get on csgo with the ryzen and rx 470

In csgo you should get about 200-300 fps

[ILKA]

Escrito originalmente por MossyRathalos:

Escrito originalmente por ILKA:

you could try an I5 7500, it beats the R5 1500X on most tests (in gaming)

I see them being neck and neck, with the 1500X having better minimums.
(Hardwarecanucks, Blunty, and Paul's Hardware are my sources)

where i live, the I5 7500 is cheaper though, although from what ive seen, the r5 1500x performs a bit worse in gaming

[Mossy Snake]

Escrito originalmente por ILKA:

Escrito originalmente por MossyRathalos:

I see them being neck and neck, with the 1500X having better minimums.
(Hardwarecanucks, Blunty, and Paul's Hardware are my sources)

where i live, the I5 7500 is cheaper though, although from what ive seen, the r5 1500x performs a bit worse in gaming

It depends on where you live. Over here its slightly cheaper.

I keep seeing it equal avg. frames while getting higher minimums due to SMT.

[ILKA]

Escrito originalmente por MossyRathalos:

Escrito originalmente por ILKA:

where i live, the I5 7500 is cheaper though, although from what ive seen, the r5 1500x performs a bit worse in gaming

It depends on where you live. Over here its slightly cheaper.

I keep seeing it equal avg. frames while getting higher minimums due to SMT.

Also, when you state that performance is neck and neck, i presume you mean by a few frames, right? because the minimums also appear to be neck and neck, essentially, get whatever is cheaper

[Mossy Snake]

Escrito originalmente por ILKA:

Escrito originalmente por MossyRathalos:

It depends on where you live. Over here its slightly cheaper.

I keep seeing it equal avg. frames while getting higher minimums due to SMT.

Also, when you state that performance is neck and neck, i presume you mean by a few frames, right? because the minimums also appear to be neck and neck, essentially, get whatever is cheaper

Yeah, basically. I see the 1500X lead in some games and the 7500 in others. It really depends on how each game uses more cores/threads and the obvious Ryzen optimizations.
Either way the difference is so slight its barely noticeable.

[Bobmac]

Thanks everyone i am interested in recording games so would the ryzen be the better option for me since it has more cores to multitask (record while i play the game)