Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I advice:
16gb RAM and a GTX 1060.
About the RAM, activating XMP in the BIOS will be enough to put the 2400MHZ one? Should i wait for the SSD? I am checking the GTX 1060 and i see the ASUS and the MSI models, I will take a closer look and check some reviews
Wow, easier that i believed, thanks! I read some about XMP and RAM OC and apparently there is no harm to the memories, so i will go for the 2x8gb 2400
higher frequency memory modules are more expensive while probably consuming greater than 1.5v (1.65v ?)...
i think 1.5v DDR3 is very okay...
No turning back......
Yesterday i took a look at differnt RAMs in Mercado Libre (the Amazon of Argentina so to speak) and i didn't see a lot of models. I will dive into it more closely and see what if i can find 2x8GB kits
You are strongly recommending the GTX 1060 and the 2x8GB RAM, is the extra performance of the SSD not noticeble in games?
SSD does not boost video games performance. It only reduces some loading time....
GTX1060 6GB ^.
SSD is worthwhile these days, I was a late ssd adopter and was a little impressed at the overall system responsiveness, the seek time on ssds are quite a bit faster than the hdd about 3 times faster.
Since the OP is in tight budget, I suggest he should get a GPU first, SSD can wait..
I used to think that way ^ but it's not as simple as that.
Pre ssd, I could copy files from a 3TB internal hdd to a 3TB usb external at only 100ish MB/s dropping to 50MB/s.
Post ssd, those same large files are copying at 195MB/s.
Even though my games are mostly on a 3TB 7200rpm internal drive they load at peak efficiency with the OS installed on the ssd.
An hdd running an OS with multiple accesses runs a lot slower than an ssd.
Looks like OP has an ssd anyway I just noticed ""HDD: SSD Samsung EVO850 (500GB) "" or he doesn't and is going to get.
So OP really just needs a gpu and more ram but 1.65v ram at his own risk intel says 1.5v +%5.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1512324/haswell-with-1-65v-memory-conclusion
No real intel ^ consensus on 1.65v with haswell.
3GB ver has chopped down cuda cores and texture units but you buy what you can afford, some games are effected more than others where ME A isn't.