安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
If you have a Microcenter near you, you can buy the 7700K for $300. I recommend i7s over i5s for gaming due to the newer titles taking advantage of more threads/cores.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 3.3 Ghz
It done suprisingly well and lasted me a long time, but it's starting to show it's age. Some games like Dishonored 2, just don't support it's SSE4a. (At least it didn't at launch. I think they patched it eventually)
It can still run games like Overwatch or For Honor great , but for CPU heavy games like large scale RTS, it just gets rekt. Can't get over 20fps in a large battle in TW: Warhammer, or Deserts of Karak. With Dawn of War 3 around the corner, I think it's time to upgrade if I want to enjoy games like that.
Woah...does Ashes of a Singularity have garbage optimization or something? 30-40 average FPS with top of the line GPUs in this CPU benchmark? I'm looking for a new CPU that can handle large RTS games...this isn't encouraging
I7 used by streamers. get this if you want to start a twitch.
The claims about future games using more threads/cores is moot too, as those have the SAME amount of cores, and the extra threads could run in parallel only if staying away from floating point, that is not really likely. Processors with 6 or 8 real cores may get a future boost but i7's HT hardly.
So buy i7 only in case you don't mind overpaying for no practically noticable improvement. Many other components could use the price diff for a better effect.
OTOH, if you play specific games, try to locate benchmark or fps data for those, measurement of actual use always beat any theory :)
Well, when looking at a few custom computer sites, if I start with the i5-7600K....
For the same price I can upgrade to the i7, or get 8 more gigs of RAM. You're saying I'd be better off with 8gigs of RAM in the grand scheme of things? I'm not going to get CPU bottlenecked a few years down the roadk with the i5?
EDIT: I do have a 120htz monitor, and that video with the benchmarks did show the i7 staying above 120 more consistnatly with more games...
I'm out of practice and don't want to mess with modern liquid cooling systems. Plus I live in a cramped townhouse that doesn't really have a nice ESD safe place to install motherboards and CPU from scratch.
You don't need liquid cooling for i7. With budget air cooling you can OC to 4.8 GHz. With high end air cooling as competitive as liquid high end you can reach 4.9-5.0Ghz. To be honest a lot of the low end liquid are worse than budget air. A min 240mm radiator system to be decent, anything with a single fan radiator is garbage unless your case can't mount dual/triple fan radiator.
NO no no that's archaic thinking.
So single fan liquid cooling is actually worse? I had no idea.
Well I'm looking at custom built computer sites right now. And all of them only have one options for air cooling. You saying I'd be fine with that if I'm not willing to spend money on the high 240mm+ liquid?
Buying a prebuilt is a trap as the components are often a step down in quality. For example with both these cpu's best performance is with DDR4 3000 ram which needs a Z mobo.
If you intend upgrading the gtx970 one day, there are two videos on you that should watch, both by digital foundry. One reviews the i5-7600k, the other reviews the i7-7700k. The videos show benchmarks for various games.
Also you may want to consider the non-K version of the i7-7700 vs the i5-7600k.