Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
I have no idea how they was marketed and if FX wasn't around then then fine upgrading them to some level of support would and should be seen as some advantage I guess but selling them as actually supporting it / not being more clear about it have lead to lots of people buying motherboards with that chip/chipset and running into troubles.
And yeah. I would definitely consider a B350 motherboard because I want to spend as little as possible for something which still works. Sadly the B350 seem like a pretty gimped board. They like to compare vs Intel i7 but X99 have both superior connectivity and processors with superior cores, cache and RAM controllers.
So what happened not long after AMD FX lineups were here to stay? Everything Athlon/Phenom disappeared, and for good reason, they had been around long enough. So to ensure AMD FX support to some extent (since you couldn't get older CPUs) was to update Motherboard to support it. Basically as long as it could technically handle up to 95W CPUs and it had the full pinned AM3+ Socket support, then it could technically support AMD FX
Now what occurs is, unless you are on 970/990FX Chipset, you can never get the full CPU features or performance on previous Chipsets, due to 7 & 8 series Chipsets not designed to utilize the way and FX CPU works. Sure it is similar to the Phenom II in some ways, but much better overall performance and CPU features.
Some games now no longer work on AMD CPUs older than AMD FM2 APUs or the AMD AM3 FX series; because older AMD CPUs lack SSSE 4.x ~ Some games are requiring this; as a means of ensuring older CPUs just get cut from any kind of support.
Overall, my point is... you can technically run an AMD FX in other boards after a bios update that supports it; such as AMD 760G, AMD 870/890; but you'd risk the boards generally poor VRMs; not to mention never getting the full CPU performance on such chipsets, ever.
970 Chipset's only downside is it is generally offered on cheaper quality Motherboards with generally poor VRMs.
Now those 95W boards with questionable VRMs; they might be fine when it comes to an FX-4 series; but the rest, generally you want to ensure quality VRMs. The downside is not the 970 Chipset itself though, so please don't think that this is what I mean.
http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/11/392183857619989022/#c392183857621031008
slow mode switch
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/mac/reviews/MSI/970GAMING/29th.jpg
Your the 4th Iv come across with the same problem here
http://www.coderbag.com/programming-c/disable-cpu-core-parking-utility
This is something that was easily overlooked for those testing RyZen on Win 8 / 10 to where by default, those OS usually have Core Parking Enabled.
Now AMD's suggestion to folks, especially for Gamers and Benchmark Reviewers, to just change Power Options in WinOS and that should over-ride any Core-Parking, however that is not a given method.
https://linustechtips.com/main/uploads/monthly_2016_02/12809808_1124069104304846_1990890440_o.jpg.c4f8292ee7700c2676549205fa02bdd6.jpg
I sent it back as it was still under warranty.They refused as I didn't have all the screws(two missing) for the stock cooler mount.That was the second thing I removed after the wrapper.
I emailed back and said, throw it in the bin where it belongs and Ill get the Ryzen mobo from another manufacture.
I haven't got a reply yet.
But yes anytime you wish to RMA hardware like Motherboard or GPU; please ensure whatever was "original" with that, gets reinstalled prior to shipping it out. Like CPU Mounting hardware, any screws for things like VGA / DVI ports (as sometimes these come off); etc.
Also for something like GPU Cooler, as long as you keep and then reinstall the original cooling unit should the GPU need replacement, should be fine there too.
I pretty much always keep the box for GPUs, Motherboards, PSU.
Modular PSUs, keep the extra un-needed cables in the original box.
These original boxes, along with their original anti-static bags are ideal for if there is a need to ship the product back or have it replaced under Warranty RMA. I use the Motherboard to store anything original for the built it is tied to, like Windows OS product key slip / any original media discs (just in case) and any extras that were non-essential to the build, but might be needed later on.
If you order any non-retail-box 3.5in HDD, those usually come like this:
https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Newegg-Single-Hard-Drive-Packaging-May-2011-Proper-Inner-Box.jpg
Keep that as well, cause it is ideal for any HDD returns.
If you do ship any hardware, ensure it is double-boxed. Never ship it directly just by the original products box alone.