Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
People with a professional camera usaully record on to a SSD but most do it simply with a SD card that they just insert in the PC via a card reader or 2,5 inch SSD/HDD SATA rack.
When you Render a scene or animation, it uses only the power of CPU. It will always use 100% power of your CPU in all cores. no matter how powerful your CPU is. Means better CPU will makes rendering faster. You can buy a $1000 CPU if you can afford.
Professional cards such as "Quadro" or "FirePro" are only used for better customized driver support. Their driver is specially made for sofware like MaX/ Maya for better compatibility. They are expensive because of their Driver support not for the Cards.
When it comes to Gaming PCs, they always use GPU to 100%, but not the CPU. So they need a top end GPU but a mid range CPU is enough for them.
Maya actually uses both the CPU and GPU intensively. Quadros will outperform GTX cards just because of their unlocked drivers and OpenGL support. It doesn't really matter though, because things like nCloth and BiForst simulations are handled by the CPU while the GPU is mostly responsible for displaying all the faces and vertices of your models. So they're equally important! The same can be said for PBR texture authoring programs.
Also, Zbrush (unfortunately) is completely CPU based and completely neglects GPU accelerated graphics, unlike for example Mudbox, which is almost entirely GPU based.
I don't really do video editing much, but I guess the reason people keep separate systems for work/gaming is because they can afford it, and because enjoy keeping work and personal life separated. In terms of hardware I doubt it'll make much difference, since Ultra setting gaming, HD video editing/compositing, digital sculpting, PBR rendering environments and 3D modeling all require both a good CPU and GPU, since they utilize both fully. You only gain performance from apps that can actually make use of Quadro technology.
So yeah, don't waste money on two decent systems, just go all out on one awesome system that's perfect for gaming, it'll work for everything else too.