Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
For pure gaming even the 7700K is not needed. Mass Effect Andromeda is the game that uses most of my CPU and even then it stays below 40% usage. The only reason to take the Ryzen 7 is for working with videos or animation when you need to render e.g.
And dont listen to the AMD-Fanboys that tell you that the Ryzen 7 will be futureproof. It might be required in more then 5 years but anyone who buys his hardware with the intention to use it in 5 or more years cant be taken serios.
Do you all know if the future processors. The ones coming out in August will use the same socket as a i7 7700k or will I need to buy a whole new motherboard ?
If I understand it right then you are suggest he should wait for a 6 core cpu instead of taking a good 4/8 core? Well then we are back to futureproof which really cant be taken serios as nobody knows how long it will actually take to require more then 4 ht cores. my guess would be more then 5 years as we not even closely use all of the cpu power yet for games.
I don't see a problem with going slightly overkill on a CPU to get 5 or more years out of it. Got nearly 7 years out of my i7 930 so far and even today there isn't any game out there that it can't run.
Unless we start seeing big performance increases with each new generation, its not that hard to get 5 years out of a platform.
you missed the point. it was not about that the hardware last 5 years it was about that maybe in 5 years that hardware becomes minimal requirement. I ment that some ppl think that you need to buy a 8/16 because it might becomes a must in the future.
yeah so did mine. But what i said was: dont by an octa core now because in 5 or more years you might gonna need one...
1800x is good gaming CPU it just not as fast as 7700k but it excel in everything else.
1800x future proof 7700k is not.
Intel fanboys? hahaha! If OP wanted to do steaming then I would have told him to get a r7 1700. Ryzen CPUs are great and finally bring some competition to the market.
What are you 10 years old? "ma ps4 is betta then yo Xbox.." come one please..
and there we have exactly what i ment with ppl that cant be taken serios. Its a fact backed up my many test that ryzen 7 in pure gaming often is weaker then the 7700k. also that thy ryzen is better at rendering which does not matter as it is not a requirement of the OP.
But how is the ryzen 7 futureproof when AMD has a long fail list and is often not supported and optimized for games? Is it futureproof because it has 8 cores? when do we actually will need 8 cores? imho not befor 5-6 years and by that time you surely dont want a ryzen 7 anymore...