Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Edit: Man, that really came off sounding bitter :P
Bitter maybe, but accurate sadly. Some (not all) people do take such things as a sign that they're above others somehow.
I have noticed that almost every suggestion on these forums gets a bunch of naysayers. I just hope Valve has something in the works to make forums a better place - moderation isn't enough.
This community has far more people who I think would use that claim a lot more.
I'm fine if they decide to add in a post count but reputation is something we don't need. It broke within a week or two on the old forums and since then it was pretty useless.
So some people used their reputation points in arguments. Why is that a bad thing? Yes, they feel important because they are popular. Just like the popular kids in the school, popular colleagues at workplace, popular friends in the drinking party. There are always people who are more popular than the others, it's the simple fact of life. No need to be bitter about it.
Forums are boring with everyone equal.
Thanks for pointing yourself why a rep system would be born broken here.
As for rep... it doesn't work well on there. New people join, who are helped by people. Because these users are new, they don't know about the rep system and until they make a number of posts they can't hand out rep anyway, so the helpful person doesn't get anything. Rep is mostly given out for humorous remarks (valve time video, taking the mickey out of a user for not knowing something) or agreeing with someone during an 'argument'.
The forums aren't meant to be, and don't NEED to be, a "popularity contest". That doesn't foster good discussions. We don't need 100 little Justin Beibers running around flaunting how much e-rep they have because they make more smileys or post more ponies than the next guy. All that does is split people into cliques and make them look down on the others. NO society needs that. Not even a virtual one. Plus it's been pointed out how easy it is to cheat and gain rep by making new accounts and farming it and other schemes. Zefar is right, it's not something we need and the forum would be worse if it were implemented.
It was pretty much post funny or nostalgic youtube video and people would +rep him like mad.
But if you actually helped someone with a problem you could get 1 +rep if you where lucky.
So now I will call you a scrub and your points are invalid because you are only steam level 1. Thats how the old rep system worked also.
To avoid abuse new users don't get to give rep until after having made a number of posts.
Most of users in need of help are usually new users, unable to rep.
So, you have a system, unable to work as it should for itself.
But make a joke, or a witty remark, and the rep falls from heaven...
Wow. I think that's /thread right there.