Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Simple one that you refer to: How would the Assassin's Creed games be ordered? They should be -
Assassin's Creed (not available in Steam)
Assassin's Creed II
Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood
Assassin's Creed: Revelations
Assassins' Creed III
but alphabetical order breaks that of course. If Brotherhood was retitled "AC3:Brotherhood" to get the order, then you'd end up with "AC5 III" is all sorts of wrong! Plus, since AC isn't on Steam, should we start with "AC1: II" or "AC2: II"? No workee.
How about the Prince of Persia games? There are two that are entitled Prince of Persia! (fortunately the first again isn't even available on Steam, but I'm sure there are others in a similar boat)
Do we include sideshoot games in the list? Where? Some people like them in the primary games list, some like them after. OCD triggers either way.
Ordering by release date doesn't work either, since Steam's idea of release date is "release date on Steam", and no use for the Tomb Raider games for example.
All in, allowing drag'n'drop list reordering by the user seems the only way to do this. This avoids alphabetical order issues entirely.
I'm sorry, what? http://store.steampowered.com/app/15100/?cc=us
essentially Square Enix owns the rights to Tomb Raider VI: The Angel of Darkness. they do not own the rights to Tomb Raider 6: The Angel of Darkness which under copyright law could be viewed as something completely different, so even if the IP holders were allowed to change the names technically they wouldn't necessarily have rights to said game.
now that is why the better idea is the ability to manually reorganize our library is the better idea. because there are even some instances where games in a series are nowhere near each other in the alphabet because of their first letter (looking at you "the Ultimate Doom" filed under "T" for "The")
AND BESIDES, WHAT WE MEANT WAS NOT TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE GAME IN THE STORE, BUT IN THE LIBRARY SO THAT IS AN INVALID RESPONSE THE LIBRARY IS COMPLETLEY SEPERATE FROM THE STORE, AND IS MERELEY PERSONAL TO EACH USER.
Actually, they do. You're also confusing trademark and copyright law, they're different things. If tomorrow Valve came out with Tomb Raider 6: The Angel of Darkness, Square Enix could sue and win, even though they don't necessarily hold the trademark (theoretically, it's entirely possible that they do own the variations). It's enough to cause brand confusion and overall is a violation of Square Enix's copyright to Tomb Raider in general.
And, I actually agree with the OP's suggestion of dragging and dropping titles to wherever is appropriate. Although I try to ignore most of the incorrectly ordered product, I can't deny that it would be nice to put things in proper release or series order.
But to be on topic, I'm not sure what you talk about. I have almost 100 games myself and all names are fine to me. They are ordered by titles of the games, nothing less.
also that name in the library has to match either a reference in the Steam store/website (which has to match the name of the tittle that the IP holder has, or it could be referring to something completely different, and claims of tampering, and it just goes down hill from there), or must have a data marker of "added externally" otherwise it would not resolve correctly. not to mention that the initial statement was "Valve please rename these games so they are in order"
and from the intent of the initial post 'I can see the reason we are not allowed to name our own games LINK' these changes would have to made globally to all users Libraries. And the only thing personal about each person's libraries is that they were all leased to one user's account, and that is it.