Move adult content to it's own platform

[MedusaNXS]

I'm not against those who want to play these games, having access. But can you please provide them a dedicated platform and make an appropriate - ADULT ONLY - platform for it? People are pushing the envelope farther and farther on what is considered 'okay' on this platform. Every other game is inappropriate content - and I don't mean 'guns, and violence'. 'College girls', sexual dating sims..etc. It's overwhelming.

[davidb11]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Originally posted by davidb11:

What?
That's not even close to making sense there.
YOU CANNOT stop people from finding porn online.
LOL wut.

You can't shut down a 14 BILLION dollar industry because of accidental kid exposure!
That is beyond absurd.

Again the only one without a real argument was you!! We ban CP to protect children, banning normal porn to protect them is perfectly logical. You used to have to go out to a store and buy it, we can go back to that system. Nothing extreme there at all.

That is insane!
No one can ever claim that.
IT makes no sense.
Good lord, man.

You cannot be serious.
You have completely misunderstood how this works.
I'm going to leave the thread again.

[zuniger]

Originally posted by SlowMango:

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Now you need to resort to putting words in my mouth? I never claimed any of that XD. This sounds more and more like me arguing with someone who is not old enough to access this material anyway XD Apparently if I don't agree with you that is equivalent to ignoring? lunacy XD

Throughout this interaction you have said David was saying there does need to be more stirct measures because they would bypass it anyway. That was never the argument.

You have incorrectly compared Steam to sites like YouTube saying they are not held to the same standard because YouTube doesn't allow pornographic content. That is false because it is purely YouTube's choice, not a legal requirement.

You have tried to imply that Steam is breaking the law by selling pornographic content to children on the site, in turn, breaking the law. This is false since Steam has the legally required protections and verification on their site.

Steam is a storefront. A storefront that is based around video games and a few OSTs for those games. Pornographic games are still games. They have enacted measures to either hide that content by default or allow you to control what your child sees on the site. In fact, without an account and the setting turned on, you can't view any pornographic material.

Maybe actually argue a real point? You do nothing but state the obvious or irrelevant.

[zuniger]

Originally posted by davidb11:

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Again the only one without a real argument was you!! We ban CP to protect children, banning normal porn to protect them is perfectly logical. You used to have to go out to a store and buy it, we can go back to that system. Nothing extreme there at all.

That is insane!
No one can ever claim that.
IT makes no sense.
Good lord, man.

You cannot be serious.
You have completely misunderstood how this works.
I'm going to leave the thread again.

According to you we do it for no reason and the we should not even ban it because peope will still do it XD
What are you on???
You're entire argument has been "do nothing cause you wont stop them all"

[Boblin the Goblin]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Originally posted by SlowMango:

Throughout this interaction you have said David was saying there does need to be more stirct measures because they would bypass it anyway. That was never the argument.

You have incorrectly compared Steam to sites like YouTube saying they are not held to the same standard because YouTube doesn't allow pornographic content. That is false because it is purely YouTube's choice, not a legal requirement.

You have tried to imply that Steam is breaking the law by selling pornographic content to children on the site, in turn, breaking the law. This is false since Steam has the legally required protections and verification on their site.

Steam is a storefront. A storefront that is based around video games and a few OSTs for those games. Pornographic games are still games. They have enacted measures to either hide that content by default or allow you to control what your child sees on the site. In fact, without an account and the setting turned on, you can't view any pornographic material.

Maybe actually argue a real point? You do nothing but state the obvious or irrelevant.

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Again the only one without a real argument was you!! We ban CP to protect children, banning normal porn to protect them is perfectly logical. You used to have to go out to a store and buy it, we can go back to that system. Nothing extreme there at all.

Do not ask of others what you cannot do yourself.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Originally posted by davidb11:

That is insane!
No one can ever claim that.
IT makes no sense.
Good lord, man.

You cannot be serious.
You have completely misunderstood how this works.
I'm going to leave the thread again.

According to you we do it for no reason and the we should not even ban it because peope will still do it XD
What are you on???
You're entire argument has been "do nothing cause you wont stop them all"

That is not, and never has been, his argument.

[Tanoomba]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Its not asking much to have the porn on a different steam app.

Seems like a big ask to me. Not just from Steam, but from the user base as a whole.

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

No reason you should be able to put Freddy fish games in a cart alongside "sex with hitler"

Counterpoint: There's no reason you shouldn't be able to. There's nothing inherently harmful about that transaction.

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

If you wanna talk about things that help nobody, then steam selling smut too/around children is definitely one of them!!

They have taken multiple steps to ensure parents can prevent their kids from seeing material like that. You say Steam can be held accountable if it can be shown that they didn't do enough to prevent kids from accessing porn, but they're already doing MORE than enough, certainly from a legal standpoint.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Originally posted by Tanoomba:

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Its not asking much to have the porn on a different steam app.

Seems like a big ask to me. Not just from Steam, but from the user base as a whole.

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

No reason you should be able to put Freddy fish games in a cart alongside "sex with hitler"

Counterpoint: There's no reason you shouldn't be able to. There's nothing inherently harmful about that transaction.

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

If you wanna talk about things that help nobody, then steam selling smut too/around children is definitely one of them!!

They have taken multiple steps to ensure parents can prevent their kids from seeing material like that. You say Steam can be held accountable if it can be shown that they didn't do enough to prevent kids from accessing porn, but they're already doing MORE than enough, certainly from a legal standpoint.

It's very easy to do.

Make an account for your kid. Set up Family View. Control the content they can see. Done.

They will never be able to access anything outside that content in the account. If they log out, they won't be able to access it.

[zuniger]

Originally posted by Tanoomba:

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Its not asking much to have the porn on a different steam app.

Seems like a big ask to me. Not just from Steam, but from the user base as a whole.

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

No reason you should be able to put Freddy fish games in a cart alongside "sex with hitler"

Counterpoint: There's no reason you shouldn't be able to. There's nothing inherently harmful about that transaction.

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

If you wanna talk about things that help nobody, then steam selling smut too/around children is definitely one of them!!

They have taken multiple steps to ensure parents can prevent their kids from seeing material like that. You say Steam can be held accountable if it can be shown that they didn't do enough to prevent kids from accessing porn, but they're already doing MORE than enough, certainly from a legal standpoint.

The fact that you think sexual content is fine around children automatically discredits anything you say.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Originally posted by Tanoomba:

Seems like a big ask to me. Not just from Steam, but from the user base as a whole.


Counterpoint: There's no reason you shouldn't be able to. There's nothing inherently harmful about that transaction.


They have taken multiple steps to ensure parents can prevent their kids from seeing material like that. You say Steam can be held accountable if it can be shown that they didn't do enough to prevent kids from accessing porn, but they're already doing MORE than enough, certainly from a legal standpoint.

The fact that you think sexual content is fine around children automatically discredits anything you say.

He never argued or even implied that. It is unwise to try and say he did since we can all see what he said.

[zuniger]

Originally posted by SlowMango:

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

The fact that you think sexual content is fine around children automatically discredits anything you say.

He never argued or even implied that. It is unwise to try and say he did since we can all see what he said.

He did



"Counterpoint: There's no reason you shouldn't be able to. There's nothing inherently harmful about that transaction."
You really cant understand why its important to separate this stuff from children?

[Boblin the Goblin]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Originally posted by SlowMango:

He never argued or even implied that. It is unwise to try and say he did since we can all see what he said.

He did



"Counterpoint: There's no reason you shouldn't be able to. There's nothing inherently harmful about that transaction."

That is not arguing that sexual content is fine around kids.

[Nx Machina]

Originally posted by MedusaNXS:

I think you're overthinking this. The games can be in the same storage. But not provided here. This platform was supposed to be - and at one time many moons ago - about video games.

They are games and as previously posted and you chose to ignore:

Originally posted by Nx Machina:

Adult Only Content is OFF by default. If you are seeing that content it is because YOU enabled it.

[AmsterdamHeavy]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Originally posted by davidb11:

Sorry, but that's not how it works.
And Youtube has Naked Yoga on it. LOL.

Why are you suggesting we completely change everything about Steam because of porn games?
THat makes no sense ever.
LOL.
And you're being lazy in not protecting your own children.
No one does that.

Youtube does not allow nudity, yes something slip through, but you are trying to argue that youtube would have the same amount of porn ban or not. Either that or your argument is that the bans don't stop everything and therefore we should not bother.

They most certainly do allow nudity. Its all contextual. "Art" especially has been given wide latitude on YT. There are nude yoga videos on YT, no they are not "oversights" or "mistakes".

There was an "art" video on YT for years about a woman who put a fish in her vag and then brewed coffee with the fish for her husband. Full nudity, include a group of dudes bareass and literally "plowing" the earth. Apparently based on some country's fertility folklore.

Yes, it was 18 restricted which means unless someone put an underage birthday in the account at creation, anyone could watch it. What? Just like here?

The content is "off" by default here. The content is also age gated if responsible parents are using Family View.

There is no issue here. This entire thread started because the OP enabled the content to even see it in the first place, and then they complain it is "overwhelming".


Well...turn it back off then ffs. You dont HAVE to see it.

So, in the context of the OP, your argument is trash "tink o da chilluns" bs. OP wasnt worried about kids, OP was worried about themselves.

[❤ Sly Succubus ❤]

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Originally posted by SlowMango:

He never argued or even implied that. It is unwise to try and say he did since we can all see what he said.

He did



"Counterpoint: There's no reason you shouldn't be able to. There's nothing inherently harmful about that transaction."
You really cant understand why its important to separate this stuff from children?

US Sex Ed literally starts for those around the age of 10+ and is a functional standard of the US education system to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, Youtube does not have a ban on nudity, they have a ban on adult content, nudity related to education of either humans or animals is 100% allowed, as is certain regulated exercise and medical courses, Steam has an existing disallowance of games that appear to have anyone depicted as a minor in adult games, to further point out how Chaos Head Noah was literally banned from Steam as it was originally though it had underaged sex but were proven that fact was false so it was allowed to be sold on Steam, Steam also has it marked as crystal clear you need to be 13 years or older to sign up on Steam, a fact that should also point out to how education of such topics would of been provided in schools when signing up properly.

Steam further more has no requirements to move content from one platform to another, the fact alone people somehow forget that Steam is located in the US and most likely is regularily checked by federal agents without anyone knowing shows how the US has zero issues with Steam and their selling of adult games.

Finally what it is worth, the selling of CP has been banned all over the US, the law however makes it CRYSTAL DAMN CLEAR that if a game involves a minor that the minor must be identified of who the real person is, if its not a real person then one must identify who its based off of, if it does not fall under either branch then the US regulates such games under art because no REAL CHILDREN were involved with the making of the game.

For what its damn well worth, that is how the actual law functions, but a judge can rule for or against the art regardless depending on how they see it, some states do have a ban on such art, other states do not, but states and their laws do not apply to Steam due to its private nature.

Due to Steams private company nature foremost, they could sell anything on their platform they damn well want and will remove it only if the United States requests it to, their literally under no one elses power besides regularly Congresses or State request, and for what its worth the fact Steam already prevents adult games with depictions of minors regardless of the above law I noted (they even did it to Nekopara 4 where they felt a catgirl that looked under age but was not but still wont allow it) so Steam is way above on the protection of children then anyone here will ever understand.

[zuniger]

Originally posted by AmsterdamHeavy:

Originally posted by Oy goyim:

Youtube does not allow nudity, yes something slip through, but you are trying to argue that youtube would have the same amount of porn ban or not. Either that or your argument is that the bans don't stop everything and therefore we should not bother.

They most certainly do allow nudity. Its all contextual. "Art" especially has been given wide latitude on YT. There are nude yoga videos on YT, no they are not "oversights" or "mistakes".

There was an "art" video on YT for years about a woman who put a fish in her vag and then brewed coffee with the fish for her husband. Full nudity, include a group of dudes bareass and literally "plowing" the earth. Apparently based on some country's fertility folklore.

Yes, it was 18 restricted which means unless someone put an underage birthday in the account at creation, anyone could watch it. What? Just like here?

The content is "off" by default here. The content is also age gated if responsible parents are using Family View.

There is no issue here. This entire thread started because the OP enabled the content to even see it in the first place, and then they complain it is "overwhelming".


Well...turn it back off then ffs. You dont HAVE to see it.

So, in the context of the OP, your argument is trash "tink o da chilluns" bs. OP wasnt worried about kids, OP was worried about themselves.

Ok now make a REAL point without making up stuff about OP. I can easily say everyone arguing against me just wants to abuse kids or something.