Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
People have asked for alternatives, but many of those places love breaking the dependencies for code, so keeping up with them just to support some videos that are usually not about games isn't really anywhere near priority. You're free to link to videos on your profile from anywhere, but they should remain within the rules for their use.
Again, why can't Steam make its own video platform for videos strictly about video games? You already have a platform for video games and photos. Video games are a lot more advanced than videos. It doesn't make sense to outsource to a different company that has been mired in controversy more and more as time passes. Steam has at least for the most part shown impartiality. Why continue to enable a company that is clearly as partisan as Twitter, Reddit, or 4 chan?
Valve hasn't made one because it costs A LOT of money thats why. Why do you think all those places have 3rd party ads infesting their videos and/or charge people a lot of money to watch ad free?
If you haven't noticed, there are no 3rd party ads on Steam. Its all for stuff they sell. Putting ads for stuff they sell on Steam won't bring in enough money, so they would have to put ads from other places on those videos to help pay and even then they would have to put a lot of ads. And if you haven't noticed, people HATE ads, specially for stuff they will never buy.
I myself use ad blocker EVERYWHERE because of people having their systems infected by ads because viruses and stuff were injected into the ads. Even sites that were trusted can and have had this done to them.
Youtube is right now looking at injecting ads server side because not enough people are warning ads and they have been having a war with ad blockers.
But because Steam is not your regular browser, people will not be able to use an ad blocker, and well if one person is able to inject a virus into an ad... well you're gonna have a whole lot of people infected.
I also won't pay to watch videos or for people to watch my videos.
Again, video hosting and streaming is VERY expensive. Are you willing to pay 50+ bucks a month to have your videos hosted on Steam? And remember if you stop paying, your videos vanish and are gone for good unless you have them stored on your computer or somewhere else.
Again, Steam is hosting video games, which are a lot more complicated than videos to host. Glossed over that to make some hyperbole about a $50 subscription, which to be blunt I'd be willing to pay at this point as I have a job and can afford it.
The canned responses are predictable enough without them just being tossed out with hyperbole and in spite of my attempting to avoid them with points about how you're already hosting VIDEO GAMES.
Steam doesn't have to be an everything platform, nor should it be. At the most it has some recording thing coming out but this is a video game store, not another video platform site.
If you want to upload videos; use a video platform.
If you want to buy games; use steam, ubi, gog ea app etc.
Given most of the op seemed very politically charged and had nothing to do with games I can already see the issue with turning steam into some sort of video platform site where users want fos (freedom of speech) which doesn't exist here in a private platform with rules. It would likely be far more strict than yt for acceptable content.
In the end its a lot of costs, management, etc and it doesn't really add anything to steam's revenue but introduces a lot of cost and risk
This is coming soon-ish...
https://x.com/thexpaw/status/1795720970742993331
https://x.com/thexpaw/status/1795720973809033332
Not long/large videos but it's something.
Its better than nothing. Perhaps I could make clips to recover some of the footage that was lost on my days off, though hopefully this feature gets expanded for larger videos that are strictly video game related, of course.
Assuming I don't lose my profile for having a soul, which is far more than I can say for the pseudo-intellectual hypocrite that responded before you.
Thank you for actually being constructive about this instead of just trying to shut me up with a canned response and a canned excuse to censor me when I didn't accept it. I would say I wish there were more people like you on the Internet, but I don't want to wish such a terrible thing on people like you. :P
The best time for Steam to add support for non-Youtube support was four years ago.