game feedback system , review

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

more and more often false opinions about games appear, which is why they are losing popularity... they are unfairly rated. One such example is The First Descendant, my favorite game, which was the victim of bad "reviews". people who played for 0.2-2 hours... mostly fans of "Warframe" who created accounts just to give the game a bad rating, such behavior is reprehensible and unacceptable! How can you rate a game with a Steam account level of 0... or playing the game for 18 minutes... zero honesty and truth in this. I came up with an idea on how to solve the problem of the above and many other situations once and for all... first - if the game is possible to complete, that is, it has up to 40-50 hours of story, set the option to rate after completing the entire game (the estimated storyline of the game is 40 hours, so you can rate it from the 40th hour) secondly, if the game cannot be completed, set that you can only rate after 100 hours. This will significantly avoid a situation in which players can create accounts as many times as they want just to post opinions... Option 3, additional to the previous ones, is to set 1 opinion per IP address, best regards and I count on quick actions in this direction because as a streamer of my favorite game, I feel obliged to publicize this problem that has affected The first descendant.

[TBS AlexDK]

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

more and more often false opinions about games appear, which is why they are losing popularity... they are unfairly rated. One such example is The First Descendant, my favorite game, which was the victim of bad "reviews". people who played for 0.2-2 hours... mostly fans of "Warframe" who created accounts just to give the game a bad rating, such behavior is reprehensible and unacceptable! How can you rate a game with a Steam account level of 0... or playing the game for 18 minutes... zero honesty and truth in this. I came up with an idea on how to solve the problem of the above and many other situations once and for all... first - if the game is possible to complete, that is, it has up to 40-50 hours of story, set the option to rate after completing the entire game (the estimated storyline of the game is 40 hours, so you can rate it from the 40th hour) secondly, if the game cannot be completed, set that you can only rate after 100 hours. This will significantly avoid a situation in which players can create accounts as many times as they want just to post opinions... Option 3, additional to the previous ones, is to set 1 opinion per IP address, best regards and I count on quick actions in this direction because as a streamer of my favorite game, I feel obliged to publicize this problem that has affected The first descendant.

Who are you to decide what is false opinions?

[Tanoomba]

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

One such example is The First Descendant, my favorite game, which was the victim of bad "reviews". people who played for 0.2-2 hours... mostly fans of "Warframe" who created accounts just to give the game a bad rating,

It's got over 95,000 reviews. It is completely unfeasible for any significant percentage of that to be people creating accounts just to give it a bad rating. It's far more likely that most who play the game don't like it as much as you do, which is fine.

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

I came up with an idea on how to solve the problem of the above and many other situations once and for all...

There are many reasons to give a game a bad review before having beaten it or put 100 hours into it. Heck, if I don't like a game then I'm not likely to put the effort into beating it in the first place. That doesn't mean my opinion shouldn't count. Steam's review system works because it's accessible and easy to contribute to. Setting astonishingly high requirements to just be allowed to write a review runs counter to the entire point of the system.

[Gwarsbane]

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

more and more often false opinions about games appear, which is why they are losing popularity... they are unfairly rated. One such example is The First Descendant, my favorite game, which was the victim of bad "reviews". people who played for 0.2-2 hours... mostly fans of "Warframe" who created accounts just to give the game a bad rating, such behavior is reprehensible and unacceptable! How can you rate a game with a Steam account level of 0... or playing the game for 18 minutes... zero honesty and truth in this. I came up with an idea on how to solve the problem of the above and many other situations once and for all... first - if the game is possible to complete, that is, it has up to 40-50 hours of story, set the option to rate after completing the entire game (the estimated storyline of the game is 40 hours, so you can rate it from the 40th hour) secondly, if the game cannot be completed, set that you can only rate after 100 hours. This will significantly avoid a situation in which players can create accounts as many times as they want just to post opinions... Option 3, additional to the previous ones, is to set 1 opinion per IP address, best regards and I count on quick actions in this direction because as a streamer of my favorite game, I feel obliged to publicize this problem that has affected The first descendant.

This is just another "The game I like got a bad ranting, do something about it!" rant.

A Steam account of 0 means... NOTHING. Your account shows up as 0 if you have it set to friends only or private. Also accounts are set to private as default.

Someone just starting out on Steam and that game that you like is their first game that they play means they will have a VERY low level.

If you can't even get the game to start up how are you suppose to get 100+ hours to give it a negative? Also if you are actually playing for 100+ hours, you more then likely like the game and your suggestion will just skew all games to positive because no one who doesn't like the game or has problems with the game and wants to refund the game, which they only have 2 hours to do, will ever be able to leave a negative recommendation.

Also it takes you about 10 seconds to change your IP address, almost as long to change your hardware ID (before you make that suggestion too). You can look it up on the internet. Literally unplug the power on your net box, wait to a count of 10, and then plug it back in and your IP will have changed. Most ISPs use dynamic IPs and all your suggestion would end up doing is banning innocent people.


So all 3 of your options are bad ideas that will never happen.

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

can a player who plays for 0.2 hours evaluate the game honestly? no, they can't, secondly, if someone doesn't like the game, ok, let them write why, and not that I don't like it because I have weak equipment etc... or I don't like it because it's p2w, there's no p2w in this game... I still don't agree with such opinions because they're untrue, I read the comments and there are seriously a lot of false and formations there, and then a potential player comes along and reads that the game is "p2w" and won't even play because I'm guided by the opinions of "experts"

[AmsterdamHeavy]

Theres no such thing as a "false opinion".

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

untrue, a lie

[Ben Lubar]

I haven't played The First Descendant, but I can fully see why Warframe players would want to try it out and also why they would take offense at a game where the premium currency has no methods to obtain it other than breaking out the credit card.

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

I wrote this post so that comments that are not true, are lies, could be removed, I do not criticize negative opinions when they are justified. I expect honest assessments and a system that will allow for this, honest assessments are everything, I did not come here to argue

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

but why do you need premium currency in this game? I farmed EVERYTHING myself, you don't have to make any payments, but I understand that Warframe offers to get premium currency in the game, but it also requires a long farm for the oberon mod alone, I farmed for 2 weeks.. I also played warframe

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

to sum up, I would like to see a more reliable game rating system, in which actual, honest opinions are taken into account, regardless of whether they are positive or negative, they have to be true, if someone rates a game after a few minutes and complains about something that puts them in a "wall" because they don't read that modules can be improved to deal more DMG, it's not the game's fault, it's the player's fault, and they still get a thumbs down, it's a bit strange that such opinions exist at all

[TBS AlexDK]

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

I wrote this post so that comments that are not true, are lies, could be removed, I do not criticize negative opinions when they are justified. I expect honest assessments and a system that will allow for this, honest assessments are everything, I did not come here to argue

You do criticize negative opinions that you don't agree with tho

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

引用自 TBS AlexDK：

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

I wrote this post so that comments that are not true, are lies, could be removed, I do not criticize negative opinions when they are justified. I expect honest assessments and a system that will allow for this, honest assessments are everything, I did not come here to argue

You do criticize negative opinions that you don't agree with tho

are you reading carefully? I do not agree with opinions that are not true, I did not write that I do not agree with all negative opinions

[Legendarny_mdw TTV]

one comment is quote "only blacks and ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ play this game" end of quote and negative opinion posted and what do you think about it? is this a normal honest opinion in a game?

[Tanoomba]

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

can a player who plays for 0.2 hours evaluate the game honestly?

Absolutely. Sometimes that's all it takes to come to the conclusion one doesn't like a game.

引用自 Legendarny_mdw TTV：

if someone rates a game after a few minutes and complains about something that puts them in a "wall" because they don't read that modules can be improved to deal more DMG, it's not the game's fault, it's the player's fault, and they still get a thumbs down, it's a bit strange that such opinions exist at all

Again, that game has over 95,000 reviews. When a game has that many reviews, any inaccuracies on an individual level become completely moot. It's got a "mixed" aggregate because, by and large, the player base has mixed feelings about the game.

[eram]

buy the game, play the game, review the game