Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I did not say to dox people, I said that an Irdeto employee should have to label themselves as such before posting.
No. If someone is labeled as a developer on the forums, then it just means exactly that: they're a developer. You see it on the forums all the time, and developers have a specific label assigned to them. I'm suggesting the same be applied to Irdeto employees.
The "Valve employee" badge doesn't mean that we outed Valve employees. Same principle.
Link to your employer?
What if they're agents on the behalf of a certain organisation whose only agenda would be to spread misinformation or biases on the behalf of their organisations? Transparency is key to a good consumer relation with a storefront.
It'd be good for developers to have to be forced to the same standards and not be allowed to post on personal accounts. Maybe the suggestion should expand that far.
Irrelevant. Reported.
Thanks for ruining the thread with your extremist accusation, Crashed.
Fair's fair would be you changing your profile name to your real name and adding which company you work for.
Maybe if I were selling something on Steam directly and were employed by a game developer/publisher/DRM developer and had an open stake in the matter.
Not in this case.
Irrelevant because if you want transparency then let the forums know who are in real life and who you work for, after all fair's fair.