About The Library And New Ways to Organize It

[MuriDX]

As we know, the collections is great way to organize mainly when the number of the acquired games get bigger and bigger overtime.

However, there is lack of specific feature on the collections that I see as utterly crucial that is the capability to create 'Groups' to store a determined number of collections as you wish.

For instance, I have collections that the games are stored in the name of the genres and franchises. But, it would be interesting by creating a group of collections under name of "Genres" of which it will just have genre's collections, the same applies to the franchises, developers, companies, publishers and so on.

[Jaunitta 🌸]

Click on the rubics cube icon > large square > this shows our collections.
Where you see the title " Your Collections " there is a small arrow on the right. Click on that Create Collections to organize your titles as you see fit, or create Dynamic Collections to group titles by a set of filters.
Click on create New Collection we are offered 2 choices 1 being create Dynamic Collections.
I have dynamic collection named after the developer;.

[MuriDX]

Originally posted by Jaunitta 🌸:

Click on the rubics cube icon > large square > this shows our collections.
Where you see the title " Your Collections " there is a small arrow on the right. Click on that Create Collections to organize your titles as you see fit, or create Dynamic Collections to group titles by a set of filters.
Click on create New Collection we are offered 2 choices 1 being create Dynamic Collections.
I have dynamic collection named after the developer;.

The issue with the Create Collections is that as Static Collections as Dynamic Collections are created based only on titles, but not in groups. Besides, the Dynamic Collection offer marker/tag that are shared by the community and it doesn't offer customization for that specific tag or marker. I'd like to create specific tags or markers myself for my needs.

What I mean the kind of functionality would be closer how to create folders on Windows: we create folders with the subfolders, the same could applies to the collections with the sub-collections.

[Takohashi]

Originally posted by MuriDX:

What I mean the kind of functionality would be closer how to create folders on Windows: we create folders with the subfolders, the same could applies to the collections with the sub-collections.

This is a decades-outdated way of organizing content.

[MuriDX]

Originally posted by Takohashi:

Originally posted by MuriDX:

What I mean the kind of functionality would be closer how to create folders on Windows: we create folders with the subfolders, the same could applies to the collections with the sub-collections.

This is a decades-outdated way of organizing content.

The analogy that I made with the Windows is merely a clarification. What I mean is basically utilize the same functions that we currently have with the collections, but with the ability to create groups of collections.

Who knows add more resources for personalized customization, what we have is still very limited.