Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And the tin cup rattles again.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1213740/She_Will_Punish_Them/
You are buying the game for its CURRENT state.
If you want a complete and finished game, buy it when it is finished and complete.
Let me see. An incomplete game is advertised. An incomplete game is sold when the buy button is clicked. An incomplete game is delivered. Sounds exactly like the opposite of a scam to me.
As always, if you want a complete and finished game. Buy it when it is complete and finished. It's almost like we were already just going over thus stuff already. Oh, that's right, we were - in another thread in Steam Discussions with a reply not an hour or so ago. Doesn't look like EA is the thing that needs fixing.
Anyway, time for the obligatory cut and paste since this song and dance never changes.
You are buying the game "As is." It's not different than if I walk into my local sporting goods store or appliance store and buy a floor model treadmill as is, or a floor model refrigerator as is.
I am buying that product as it sits with no further implied warranties or functionality. It may work perfectly fine for the next 10 years, or it may fall apart a week after I get home. That is the risk I take for buying something "As is." An Early Access game is no different. You are buying a product as it sits and you are entitled to nothing more than that, nor is anything more than that promised. The fact that there are people in this world who are unable to grasp that simple concept does not mean that there is anything borked with or anything that needs to be fixed with Early Access. The only thing that needs fixing are the attitudes when it comes to the entitlement some wrongly believe they are due.
Back in the day, I was fortunate enough to have the right connections in order to be invited to closed Alpha and Beta testing of games. So I was able to play games that my friends could not, in an early state of development. Many of those projects, developed by indie or smaller studios, never made it past the closed testing phase for one reason or another. However, I was able to play quite a few that made it to the finish line and beyond. My friends never saw the projects that were never finished, they only got to see the ones that made it to store shelves.
What things like crowdfunding and Early Access enable now is the ability of my friends to buy their way into those testing phases they were never privy to before. They now get to see what I got to see as an Alpha and Beta tester. They get to see the trials and tribulations of game development as it happens, and yes - they even get to see the failures. That's the only difference here. Game development hasn't changed all that much from those glory days. It's just that more people are now able to participate in a process that was traditionally only reserved for in house personnel, or a select few outsiders, like myself.
There is nothing wrong with Early Access as it is, and there certainly is nothing that needs to be fixed with the concept in and of itself. It is working as intended, and I for one, am glad to now have the opportunity to experience and play games that (even with my old connections) I would never have the opportunity to play and experience today. And I certainly don't think that the process needs to be changed or ruined because a select few people don't have the wherewithal to manage their own expectations about the game development process. This isn't rocket science. These are concepts so simple that even a caveman like myself can understand them.
They are announced, and not released.
They are not Early Access.
This is primarily about abandoned games that do not get further development. Perhaps it's a lack of finances, loss of interest in the developer or many other reasons, but there are games that are left on their own. A buyer can buy it “as is” of course, but in most cases it's useless unless it's something unique.
More responsible developers explicitly say, development is discontinued there will be no updates. In some cases, they themselves put a lower price or free access. Then there are developers who write a plan, raise money and walk off into the sunset. These unfinished games will gather dust in the dustbin of history for 5-10-100 years. Why not hand over the management of these games to Steam? Participate in sales, pricing policies in different regions. This is more loyal than just removing abandoned games after a while. You can just hide such games from the user side as I do.
Anyway this is my opinion, you can have your own.
We cannot set arbitrary time limits.
It does not get any CLEARER than:
"Get instant access and start playing; get involved with this game as it DEVELOPS".
"This Early Access game is NOT COMPLETE and MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE FURTHER. If YOU are not excited to play this game in its CURRENT STATE, then YOU should WAIT to see IF the game progresses further in DEVELOPMENT".
In order to get an Early Access game there are 7 steps:
1) Went to the store page.
2) Added the game to your cart.
3) Viewed your cart.
4) Continued to payment.
5) Entered the security code if you are using a card.
6) Ticked the Steam Subscriber Agreement box (includes the refund policy).
7) Clicked confirm.
All those 7 steps are voluntary not mandatory.
So the question remains is waiting a problem?
I thought in general adding a “hide abandoned games” button would help.
I sometimes search games with various filters and the large amount of “dead games” is shocking.
I think it's just easier to read the store page and not buy any Early Access game that has received the notice of not being updated in a long while. Safest way to do it than an unverifiable "abandoned" filter that Steam would never do
That's what I'm doing at the moment.
Additionally I hide these games, right now there are a little over 10000 of them, but unfortunately they will be 3/4 of all the games in the store in my opinion and that's sad.
Maybe when there will be a lot of these games, Steam will implement some kind of filtering system, but not in the near future.
There are over 100k games on Steam total. Early Access makes up a smaller portion of them than you realise. I wouldn't hide them, because you might miss out on some real gems that are doing great.
What you are describing would be blatantly illegal and not allowed. Steam does not own those games and they cannot change the price of someone else's property.
By releasing the game in early access, the developer and the Steam platform enter into some agreement. There may also be a clause with some conditions about the duties and responsibilities of the parties. But in this case it will be only for new agreements most likely.