Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
You do choose which drive you want the download on, right?
This doesn't even take into account what it is doing to your CPU though.
Wouldn't it be simpler to make that HDD the default instead?
There is literally no value in trying to figure out ways to not use a SSD. The "lifespan" is not a concern. If you sit down and do the math, you will see it would take decades to wear out most SSDs in most scenarios. "Lifespan" only become a concern in the short term if you're filling drive up completely as fast as possible. In which case imagining Valve should try to mitigate that inconsequentially by trying to micromanage SSD usage is more than silly.
If you want to use a secondary drive or HDD for updates, make that drive the install location for Steam and put a SteamLibrary folder on your primary drive. Nothing wrong with doing that.
Why did you install all the DLCs for the CoD HQ?
yes, that's EXACTLY what I'm doing and EXACTLY the reason for this post
THIS IS A RANDOM EXAMPLE
with bloated file sized for AAA games, give me some QoL feature that let me play a small indie game while the huge game is downloading in another disk without degrading the performance for either
"it's" in this case would be "solid storage media" which I think you intended to say SSD but wanted look technical or something.
If you're fussing over HDD lifespan, your language is sloppy. If not, then maybe keep your arguments straight.
Regardless of SSD or HDD making bogus arguments about lifespan isn't a very good argument for the feature you want.
Ok I think I see, you think running a game installed on a C: is so disk intensive you should shuffle work off to disk D: or vice versa. I'm not sure why you think that exactly. Again the biggest issue is going to be CPU usage as uncompresssing data is going to have more of an impact.
I'm just having trouble seeing what you think your disk drive hokey pokey gets you. SSDs have more than enough performance to run a game, windows and download at the same time. And HDDs performance is just crummy and no amount of hand waving or optimizing will change that. Your feature wouldn't hurt anything. But if it's just a placebo, then not sure why Valve would do it.
Do you have any data about the performance impacts of downloading updates while playing a game on the same drive? Are you sure it's really worth the fuss?
Kinda seems like your imagine run amok a little bit. Although to be fair I haven't bought an HDD sin 12 years so I'm a bit spoiled by not having to fuss over disk performance.
I don't want to download / update the a game on the same disk I'm currently using, I don't want to download a game on C while I'm playing on C, but I'm perfectly fine with a game being updtaed on D while I'm playing a game on C, somehow you utterly misunderstand everything said here and though exactly the opposite of what's being said
and that suggestion of doing it manually is dumb, am I suppose to toggle all haves I have installed every time I play a game in another disk? better to have an option to just automatically do it