安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The OP's suggestion actually opens up to confusion from people who misread GB and MB, because both would have to be used then and would change depending on the game's size (+1 GB would use GB's, <1GB would use MB's)
That or you end up with games using 0.056 GB, which is just as silly.
Approximately. 1GB=1024MB.
For a 15GB game, it's a difference of 360MB.
A lot? Depends on your connection.
But it's not hard to calculate, just add 2% (for 1020).
15*1000 = 15,000, plus 15*20=300. Now you're only off by 60MB.
Still a lot? Then you shouldn't be downloading a 15GB game in the first place.
Its close enough, anyways its bad to have to worry about that small margin, if your drive is that full it gets fragmented fast and performance suffers, and its bad for your drive, so it shouldn't be something one has to worry about in the first place. That being said if the size is under a gb it should be listed in mb not gb.