安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
but you like what you like :)
i have plenty of paid games in my steam library that have zero microtransactions
As far as does Steam actually provide me with services, outside of buying/playing games ofc, that I personally care a significant amount about. Well the answer is yes. I do make use of the parental controls which have gotten better in the beta combined with family share. I also personally use the guides section quite a bit and while the forums aren't a deal breaker I can't sit here and pretend like I'm not regularly active on them.
It's not the only platform that provides these things, but it is all in one package and overall the software itself has rarely lessened my experience doing the main thing it's for i.e. purchasing and playing games. There is of course always room for improvement and Valve can move quite slow in that regard at times. They've also made some moves over the years that were boneheaded imo, but if I had to summarise my experience in a single word it wouldn't be disappointed, it would be content. Of course I'm similarly content with GOG as well. Epic is the only platform really that I'd say the features (or lack thereof) and performance for me have leaned more into the negative then positive.*shrugs*
If you spending money on steam for some single player off line game it's questionable why buy it on steam where you need to have steam running to play it, if it's truly a game you can play without steam running in the back ground.
I
But again I don't really consider top notch game a single player offline experience any more, I suppose it's different tastes but I am pretty demanding when it comes to game quality I didn't get a computer to play 8 bit indy games that look like Nintendo 1990 knock offs
That's weird I just looked at factorio and the graphics didn't look impressive to the point at a glance I wouldn't even consider it for 10 dollars let alone 35. Plenty of simulation games that offer better graphics and play style, again different likes.
But Im unimpressed if your easily impressed, could explain why my opinion differs with so many. I didn't get a new computer to pay 35 dollars for a mine sweeper game
also pixel games to me look way better than most of these other games with over done graphics and bad gamplay.
but thats me.
Also It didn't help the fact it was left4deads repeated stages, witch really brought back some dejavu with users who realized the stages where comparison the same thing we all played in 2003 or 2004 when left 4 dead released
That's basically the only objective measure of quality. And funnily enough, the only measure that matters to Valve, Developers, and Publishers.
SO.. you can enjoy games without spending money, and the rest of us can enjoy those SAME games PLUS the ones you actually have to pay for. Seems alright from my end.
Yeah. Plenty of people on the platform m8. Sales figures don't lie. I mean Helldivers sold what 8 million copies on steam ...so there's at least 8 million peeps on the store.
There is nothing people won't complain about. L The thing is. Those are the minority. The Majority of the steam user base are having fun enjoying their games and the interactions with their friends in those games.
Does youre Mileage vary? That's YOUR issue and no one elses.
There aren't plenty of simulation games within that niche though. In fact I can only name 3 (of which one is Factorio) that are of a high enough quality you could compare them favourably to one another. As far as being easily impressed, that's not the case. It's a differing of perspective where I'm not as concerned with graphics as I am with the overall mechanics of a game and the complexity of those mechanics, particularly within simulation games.
Dwarf Fortress is another example that graphically....is very, very far from impressive yet, no matter how many colonist style sim's or god games I've played (and its a lot) I've never found anything remotely close to it's level of depth and complexity. There is an artistry in that, that I can appreciate. Don't get me wrong though I like graphically good looking games as well, it's just not my primary motivator for picking up a game.
As far as why buy games on Steam that are single player. I buy games wherever has the best deal. Sometimes that's Steam at the time I'm looking sometimes it's not. I personally don't care whether Steam, GoG Galaxy, Epic Game Store, Origin etc. are running in the background when I play a game. None of these make a noticeable difference in performance for me.
This previous spring sale it was $6.99. The 3 DLC included with the base game was $10.