Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Hozzászólási szabályok és irányelvek
Hozzászólás jelentése
Also, it is not exactly unusual for highly intelligent individuals to be socially withdrawn and problematic. Isaac Newton would never get in your game if it was possible to check for team and social skills with a predefined test.
Why so sure you would achieve the arbitrary baseline score anyway? People tend to overestimate their own intelligence, after all.
OP's suggestion is plainly full of loopholes
Valve is a company that wants to make money, not block people from paying them.
What you want OP, is not "help players with low IQ avoid humiliation and additional stress in the gaming environment", but purely on self-interest. Play ranked, you will still face such people regardless. IRL, you will face such people regardless. Just go live out on the woods. Problem solved.
The IQ test does not test for things like interpersonal skills, emotional intelligence (putting aside the debate whether this is or isn't 'intelligence'), the ability to communicate socially, cooperate effectively with others etc. All that is to say an IQ score would have no bearing on whether someone was a good teammate, is toxic, and likely whatever else you're wanting to eliminate from your games.
Looking at the world more soberly doesn’t change the fact an IQ test does not test for the things you’re proposing are a supposed problem. Plain and simple.
What you’re really saying is “I don’t have a counter argument so I’m going to make this a you issue instead of admitting my idea to deal with being butthurt and blaming everyone else for my losses in team games is ♥♥♥♥”
remember the golden rule, do unto others what you would have done unto you. And before you take that literally ("oh, I have high IQ so im good" I mean, by whos metric?) I mean consider how it would feel if there was a filter system for popularity or social generosity... would you want to be filtered out because of someone elses idea of what it takes to interact with others? Especially after you paid money for something thats suppose to allow you to interact with others as a standard feature?
thats the sober reality here.
You haven't been able to put forth though how you're assessing people's capabilities in a manner that matters for gaming though. I already mentioned this, but I'll make elaborate further. The IQ test does have a verbal section. That includes verbal comprehension and working memory.
Verbal comprehension is made up of vocabulary, similarities, and overall comprehension. What it doesn't test for at all, is your ability to actually communicate with another human being. You can have an extensive vocabulary and understanding of a given language while still being an extremely poor communicator and/or socially inept. It's not hard to find extremely intelligent people, famous or otherwise, who fall into this category. You can also look at autism here. Now autism is a wide spectrum so this is not absolute and 100% varies in degree, however individuals that struggle with social interaction on the spectrum do not tend to do so because of their vocabulary which in some cases can be quite extensive. It's really the social cues, adherence to routines etc. that cause issue.
That leads to how you can have a limited vocabulary and still communicate very well in social settings, because your average conversation, especially in a game, doesn't require the level of verbal expertise that would be required in say an academic setting. A lot of communication is understanding social cue's, empathy, active listening etc. something which is not tested for at all through an IQ test.
There are in fact a long list of skills that the IQ test does not measure for that translate to doing well in a game like Dota. Teamwork, reflexes, fine motor skills, hand-eye coordination, adaptability, performance under varying levels of stress, attitude, experience, emotional resilience (this is a big one cause damn do people tilt), and on and on.