Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Do you know what the hackers will think????
1) wow, i can use the same hacking tool to get inside the programs, services, windows os, websites.....etc that uses the same 2fa extremely easily
----------
There are already threads lying all over the steam forum with same thread title
Yubikey is a completely separate device bruh, its not windows, every single major website uses OAuth, steam guard is 2FA yes but its a proprietary 2FA, for logins, physical key or open source 2FA is miles better
Then why gmail, hotmail, blizzard entertainment gaming platform, Ubisoft, Activision......etc didn't use ''yubikey'' as 2fa
I disagree as i have being here 19+ years and have never lost access to my account and that includes before Steam Guard Email and Steam Guard Mobile existed.
Why do others lose access to their account?Because they give away all their account details. The account name, the password and the KEY to the door, the Steam Guard Mobile code.
Well that is your opinion. The facts shows though that the Steam 2FA is perfectly secure as it is.
Yubikey won't make it anymore secure.
Common sense and brain are perfectly viable.
Google accounts (Gmail) and Microsoft accounts (Hotmail) actually do both support Yubikeys. Google has something they call the Advanced Protection Program[landing.google.com] which is their highest level of account security which requires a FIDO-compliant security key to use. Yubikeys are FIDO-compliant security keys. Google also has their own Google Titan security keys.
but steam is the only place 2fa has actually helped me.
I think the current 2fa is good, it works, and so long as you arent stupid you should be fine.
Yubikeys are a vendor-specific hardware implementation of a FIDO Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) authenticator. FIDO U2F and other FIDO protocols are available in open source specifications created and maintained by the FIDO (Fast IDentity Online) Alliance - an open industry association whose aim it is to create interoperable and strongly secure means of authentication.
Both Google and Microsoft are founding members.
Both Google Accounts and Microsoft Accounts can be signed into using FIDO authenticators ('hardware keys'). Microsoft brought that feature to other platforms like GitHub as well, btw.
And did you know social media platforms like Facebook are also supporting it?
Tons of other services as well. Also quite popular with e.g. password managers and other services that value strong user security in some capacity. Take for instance the popular privacy-minded Proton Mail, which also supports it.
Educate yourself first, before you run your mouth off - maybe?
The reason platforms like Steam, Battle.net and UPlay don't support it is because strong user security is not an identifying selling point to them. Gamers are notoriously a market segment of people with a mostly laissez-faire attitude towards such things, scant few exceptions to the rule withholding - such as people regularly popping up in these type of threads.
FIDO would make it objectively, provably* more secure - through the simple fact that FIDO's U2F 2nd factors cannot be phished without malware actually being present on the client device. You literally can't accidentally slip your credentials to a scam site. It is made physically impossible through how the protocol works.
*) I'm not kidding about the "provably" either, btw. There are literally scientific papers that prove through rigorous math that FIDO U2F is always more secure than any protocol involving manual human intervention - such as having to manually scan a QR code; or manually enter back a one-time code.
For a FIDO security key, to share your key with others means literally sending the physical security key device itself to another person. It's significantly easier to accidentally send a 5-digit alphanumeric code to someone in China (or, scan a fraudulent QR code provided by someone in China) than it is to accidentally internationally ship your security key to China.