Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Excuse me? "Normal"?
It's not.
Gee, what an interesting way to say "for being bigots who are against their very existence".
Well, isn't that convenient? The hate speech doesn't actually count, because it's "just trolling"! Funny how so many "trolls" tend to share the same bigoted beliefs.
I am out, Lie yourself if you must. I know the truth and it is for what it is.
So you spoke to the person who invented the phrase and they confirm it?
Though even if it was true that only speaks to the start of something, it can become something else. Like the word ♥♥♥.
I have.
Kinda is.
To exclude someone of a particular group based on gender, ♥♥♥, ideology.
Ironically history has taught that the best way to fight hate is through inclusion, Ie actually interacting positively with said haters. Emphasizing the similarities and common ground as opposed to the differences. Yeah itsb a slow process, takes generations, but it does actually work.
Exclusion creates camps, inclusion builds communities.
No, excluding a hate group that wants to kill you from your own group is not discrimination, unless you are using the definition of discrimination that means any choice anyone makes is discrimination, which is not the relevant definition here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Verified Citations?
Again some how i don't think the guy who coined the phrase is directly listed as one of those citations, nor do I think said person authored the article
Considering how liberally the word 'Nazi' gets applied ... yeah. Pardon me if it doesn't illicit a knee jerk 'Reeeeeeeee. Bad Double Un-Good!!" reaction.
i would agree, if i knew any trans people that hate "straight" ones because they are straight
i know ones that hate those that hate them
not like that ever works
Its' nothing that already doesn't happen with country flags.
Context points towards written documents of intention by such perpetrators. Linking to them would also be inappropriate for the forums, but I'm sure a DuckDuckGo search would give you some good results.
Literal written intentions by such individuals do show that it's contrary to your belief. It shouldn't be a thing, but it is an unfortunate norm on social media of such types and per events.
As said with the other;
Use them interchangeably as you want, same things. I doubt "default" or "standard" or "factory settings" would be respectful for a species as it sounds too robotic.
Literally is, children are easily influenced which is why extreme types try to influence them in school without informing parents of such intention to bring up such in a classroom. I have seen parents and teachers adopt this like a social prada bag, so they can claim their own/their students are such a thing to look more progressive in their political circles.
Also having been directly involved in educational doctorates in regard to such subjects; it's very much a trend, and they mostly care about the grant money from making new programs that have the most current version, just like the flags; it's all about money.
Calling everyone a "troll" or "bigot" for differing opinions or perceiving others opinions being different frequently in threads is generally also something that severely damages this sort of movement, and often will display an indefensible position.
The dangerous part is when one side says all opposition is;
which has been the line ingrained in such individuals which tends to create such mass-events.
They are welcome to look at it, but it seems clear a few are getting needlessly personal over mere perception of disagreement.
Some also forget that this month companies may appear to have somes beliefs with flags on social media, but the social media accounts for other countries/cultures often do not display the same things because it's not trendy or profitable there, so it all comes back down to money, not so much actual belief; if they believed in it, then all of the accounts including for overseas/arabic areas would use the same.
Op and others have basically politely agreed to disagree or pointed out the option exists to decorate ones own profile as-is or write whatever on the profile as-is. The middle ground is already there. Some are taking it too personally for mere disagreement.
I find when people throw that word around it's usually just as per the norm an attempt from such to try discrediting the opponent as "evil" or worse so people more emotionally driven are less likely to listen to them as they likely would win in a debate. Needless to say, wiki itself is often a terrible source of information, which is why most colleges would fail your assignment if you tried using it as a "source" as colleges declared it not a valid source of information.
The fact that the first to claim can be protected against "vandalism" is also "very telling" as to the immense bias as I have seen bad information be protected from factual corrections and even statements from the original sources that are contrary to what the wiki article pushes. Kind of like sites that stop allowing you to see how many people dislike something when its hated by audiences & the amount that dislike it, only allowing the "critics" reviews to remain up; all about control of self-declared information rather than being honest with people, because if people were to be shown honest information they'd likely start questioning any movement/information then turn on the narrative/party especially when a party emotionally throws out accusations of "nazi".
Yup, hell just skimming through this thread speaks volumes to your point. Intentional incendiary posts, focusing on ad homenims and generalizing, bad faith arguments, outright hate speech, and im not talking just one side or the other here the whole threads has just become one giant mess.
People already use profile information to make attacks (a while back before privating my profile someone tried to call me a trans weeb anime lover as an insult because my profile at the time was set up with badges and wallpapers from Long Live the Queen, great ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game btw, and I just had a good laugh bc I’m like…. The cis-est cis male you can find, big hairy Italian dude lol). On top of being impractical outside of using a freeform text box, it’ll just give people more ammo. As has been said, just use the freeform text boxes that already exist if you want to make it known what your gender identity is. It’s probably safe to assume most people on steam won’t really care what your identity is and treat you more based on how you act.
Knowing how discussions usually go on here, all it will do is either give people another reason to attack someone personally, or people will use the “gender” card when someone calls them out of bad behavior.
Side note, love the profile pic.
Really? Why would it be inappropriate for the forums? It's relevant to the current conversation.
Can you elaborate on that? Not really sure what you mean by this.
Yeeeep, and sadly those extremists tend to paint the rest of their group in a bad light because they’re either the most vocal or get the most attention with their crazy ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Agreed, addition to that, trans love to use "hate speech" card and "discrimination" card..
What most dont realize is that it is hate speech when one call "cis" in referring to straight male. Unfortunately as we all know that steam supports trans/woke ideology. Which also doesn't resolve the underlying problem.
Hate speech goes both ways not one way street.