Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
People will always try to justify their actions and try to tell themselves that they're not evil, that they're not in the wrong, that there's something wrong with other people. But it's like I say, "The more you have to justify your actions, the more evil the actions".
Plus Lolicons have been jestering me as if it means something other than 200 points. I've probably gotten as many points from being jestered as I gave to people today.
Again. How do you know ONLY lolicons are jestering you? Do you have any evidence?
If it is not sexual, then what is the differentiation between shojo and loli? Generally curious as I've never heard anyone argue that lolicon/shotacon as genre's were not innately sexual.
Just so we're clear, what exactly are you asking? Your question doesn't make sense.
Have you never heard of Kanna Kamui? Only to name one popular loli... Azusa? Rikka? Hecate? Shinobu? Yuuko? Yoshino? Nagi? Shiro? Aria? Mei? Konata? I could name many other ones. Loli are in SO many anime and games out there. They are everywhere.
It is sexualization of minors by definition. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon#Definition_and_scope
A "loli" is a character with childlike features such as body, mannerism etc (and example would be Rebecca from the cyberpunk anime). Lolicon is like the other complexs (like mother, sister etc). Loli is literally not sexual by definition and to think so says more about you than it does about others.
Imma be honest here it's kinda ridiculous that I literally have to type this because you can't even tell the difference between 2 words.
Please educate yourself.
Did you read the paragraph I linked to? It explicitly states that lolicon is pedophilia.
If you think you know better than Wikipedia, edit the article.
But Wikipedia generally doesn't make claims with dozens of citations as a fluke.
1 - You directly quoted a post saying "loli means young girl" then directly said it was sexual and linked a wikipedia article for a different word (lolicon). I shouldn't have to explain this but here we are.
2 - I pointed out how you clearly didn't bother to read or understand even the most basic concept of words not being the same. Then you of course not reading again did the same thing in responding to me again.
This truly is a bruh moment.
Now to go on to what you are feebly trying to argue based on a wikipedia article (about lolicon not loli lol):
You are I assume trying to say that because a wikipedia article told you (or rather you interpreted it that way because you can't be bother to read it, as it doesn't say that but rather is talking about the history and controversy of the genre) that lolicon is pedo? Beyond the ridiculousness of this statement that can be countered by simply saying the same thing of an article that says the opposite or even bringing up usa laws (since steam is usa based) on how they are not classified as cp then that would mean they are not.
To put it simply, please don't talk about stuff you clearly know nothing about because you want to say drawings bad but can't be bothered to do the barest of research to even know the difference between loli and lolicon in the first place.
Lolicon is... well from a lot of different sources is either a genre focusing on child/young/child-like characters (usually in a sexual way) or slang to describe somebody with a sexual attraction to fictional minors.
Thats about as deep as I'm going to go, Lolicon stuff just makes me very uncomfortable in general. You all have fun.
---
Sources.
https://www.yourdictionary.com/lolicon
https://www.wordnik.com/words/lolicon
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/25434
https://www.encyclo.co.uk/meaning-of-lolicon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon (There is a lot of history here, very long read)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loli
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Loli
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolita_fashion
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Lolita_complex
As long as "loli" are in SFW drawings/games/anime, I don't see a reason to ban them. And if it's NSFW, looks like Steam already ban games like that (like with "Order us" week or two ago)
I've even checked and animes like Girls und Panzer or No Game No Life are tagged "loli" there. Or more accurately character type in those animes.
But this has happened before with misrepresenting definitions, so it's not surprising.
I'm not asking about the demographic shojo. I'm saying that shojo is the literal word you would use in Japanese to say "young girl". You would never call a young girl on the street loli. Why is that if they both 'just' mean young girl?
You don't call adolescent Japanese boys 'shonens' do you?
You're trying to apply genre/literary terms to people. It doesn't work like that.