Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Second off, Loli, Lolita, and Lolicon, are loan words and thus use Katakana. Lolicon would be ロリコン or rorikon. Loli would ロリ and Lolita would be ロリタ. To teach a bit of Japanese ロ = ro, リ = ri, コ = ko, ン = n, and タ = ta.
Third off, you would not go up to a young girl in Japan and call them ロリ. Depending on if you wanted to be more formal or not, you would say either 女の子 (Onna no ko), 少女(Yes, Shōjo), or if they were between certain ages(8 to 18), 女子 (Joshi). If you wanted to be incredibly informal, you would say お姉さん (Onēsan), which means older sister, but is used for younger girls by people who are older than them.
So no, 少女 isn't a genre and ロリ is not something you'd call a little girl.
Well, that solves that.
Sasori already explained it, I've already explained it. Others have already explained it. It is a reference to pedophilia. All that I said is that you would not go up to a little girl and say that they are a ロリ. It would be seen as incredibly disrespectful, and calling them a ロリコン would be extremely disrespectful or even get you busted for sexual harassment of a child.
My entire argument was that there are terms in Japanese that do translate to little girl, things you would call a young girl and one of those is 少女.
Being disrespectful is a cultural thing. Does not mean it's sexual.
As I stated before ロリコン comes from the book, The Lolita Complex, in which a grown man wanted to sleep with a 12 year old girl. By the literal definition of ロリコン, it is material that shows young girls in extremely suggestive to explicit scenes targeted towards grown men, specifically around the same age as the main character of the book, who was in his 30s. Meaning by definition it is pedophilic material.
I want it off steam as a whole.
Hey look, a deflection.
Besides, I've figured out that I can add custom tags that steam doesn't have on it thanks to eram. So... so much for me not caring, I guess.
id have to agree, almost all of the adult content on steam should be removed for the sake of the platforms "woke" and non offensive disclosure of a platform that welcomes underage children to participate.
there is just no reason to believe that a age filter would stop a underage "child" even is they are 13 from accessing adult content and or showing it to even younger people who are in the household.
already there are several threads about offended parents who removed the filter for some violent games which resulted in steams adult content being shown on the steam store.
steam isn't a porn industry and should really get out of the porn game selling.
Both are used outside of demographics and/or a literary sense though. Shounen-dan is quite the common term for young boys groups, sporting or otherwise. It's also used extensively in the legal sense to mean juvenile regardless of gender. Shoujo I've seen in written form, but I've not heard it used outside of demographics otherwise. This doesn't really matter though, because it is true that referring to a real child as a loli would be frowned upon.
When it comes to the actual word though it's not really sexual. It's just a descriptor. Lolicon on the other hand very much was describing the sexual attraction to loli's at it's onset. Colloquially the usage seems to have shifted some, where the attraction is still very much a part of it, but not necessarily a sexual attraction. There are arguably better terms that could be used for that though over co-opting a term centered on sexually explicit images of children even if fictional. I've always found the "but its fictional" defense a bit odd when it comes to R18 lolicon material, because there's still something about the characterization of a child that is found sexually appealing...and I just can't wrap my head around the attraction itself or why that would be ok.
For Valve's role, I don't think they should enforce my own morality, but they should air on the side of caution and naturally follow the law when it comes to sexual content depicting minors.