Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
It wasn't my intention to make a moral grandstand. Though intent and outcome are different. I am glad for your input and it gave me a bit to think about.
well, that's a fictional book made by a csam victim, i dont see any problem by using a expression from that book
this is just fictional
you're comparing real child abuse to fictional content
Moving on from that though. The Lolita Complex is an entirely different book. As the title suggests The Lolita Complex is a reference to Lolita, but it's from a different angle. It presents itself as a serious analysis of abnormal sexuality surrounding adult and child relationships. Analyzing case histories, interviewing experts and things of this nature.
Analyzing is not my own words but the authors, because the book is dribble and it's widely believed the case history is largely if not completely fabricated. It's a bit reminiscent of someone who takes a abnormal psychology introductory class and then goes on to diagnose everyone around them, but it was also written in the 60's which adds additional issue's on top of. Why this book would resonate in Japan or lead to the rise of lolicon is beyond me. I'm not familiar enough with the culture at the time to even begin to speculate, but the book in the West at least, was never looked at as more than a sham.
I was going to let this topic completely die, but I'll just drop this here. Drop my mic. And go back to The Witcher.
Hentai content must be removed from Steam as it is far too close to a normalisation of rape and **dophilia.
Another solution that bypasses the accusations of censorship by the art-loving, freedom-of-speech-loving gamers (lol) is to allow users to *sort the viewing of games by developer country of origin*....
Personally, I automatically skip almost all Japanese , Korean and Chinese games and always spend time to determine if a game comes from these countries before assessing an investment in time or money.
It has nothing to do with race, it has to do with culture and game design.
Being able to filter out games from these countries ( which to me are more than 90% garbage if not downright nauseating) - this would make Steam a MUCH more attractive game store for me.
No doubt we can help Valve understand it is in their interest to clean up their act here. If profit is all they understand: the market for this pathological, anti-human garbage is dwarved by the number of people who DO NOT WANT IT HERE.
This argument does not stand up to any honest examination. Child abuse happens in real life and nobody should stop artists and authors from approaching it.
That is NOT what this culture is about.
You do not graphically dwell on these acts if you need to include them in your story.
This culture is about selling product to people who getting turned on by child abuse, and about normalising it, along with the pathological mixing of sex with violence.
People who get turned on by hentai, lolis, waifus etc, and have virtual friends instead of human beings are in urgent need of help and therapy.
the question is who at steam allowed this type of content and why, and also why is it so easily accessed by even limited accounts, it is extremely dangerous to the morals of youth that a child could for all purposes, download steam, be a free user and remove filters to obtain full adult content nudity games.
the issue falls with this lack of ethical compassion and endangerment of children on the platform.
there is no reason the content is needed for any adult, the games themselves don't belong on a video game market and certainly shouldn't be sold on a platform that is also for kids.
there are at least a dozen or more games that support adult content themes of nudity and sexuality, including a dozen with gender indifference, they are corrupting on all levels for both adult and childen exposed to them, it doesn't matter if its accidental or not, steam has the power to protect its customers by removing all the content from everyone and maintaining a ethical and moral platform.
its up to steam to represent its platform and community by removing the filth.
But I see the Lolicon defense squad has already started to pull out the jesters again.
Edit: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedophilia For people who want to make the "it's not real" defense. Point to me the exact point in this definition that it says, "Real children". Because it doesn't.
Gamers aren't a homogeneous group. There aren't enough people who would actually stop using Steam to get their point across. Heck, if all the people who actually made complaint threads and posts about the "porn" games on these forums now stop buying games on Steam, it still wouldn't be noticed by Valve.
Most gamers don't give a hoot. They merely focus on the stuff they like, not the stuff they don't like. The people using forums and social media to complain and such are minorities, not majorities.
Which has actually been proven false multiple times. A lot of the child predators getting off on the power imbalance and a dominance fetish, its not limited to children, they are just the easiest victims.
Especially in cases of child abuse by family members its rarely a pedophilic motivation.
There are large studies about this subject.
I recommend reading this by the Australian Institute of Crimonology:
https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi429
Especially the " Misperception 1: All child sex offenders are paedophiles" section.
Then you did not look very closely. GOG has been selling hentai games for years now, a ton of visual novels and other stuff. They even published games that Steam refused to publish.
The only way you did not see them on the GOG store is if you are from Germany or some arabic countries where the sale of those games online is not allowed for different reasons.
Only one half of what I said was disproven. But still, child predators can be pedophiles. Just like pedophiles can go their entire lives without touching a child. The crux of the argument is that just because they're not predators does not mean that they are not pedophiles.
Also... I love how stats of other nations were used rather than the United States, despite the fact that there are other factors at play in those nations. Such as Japan's low reporting rate and even if you do report, if it's not a slam dunk case, it's hard to get it in court. Meanwhile US studies tend to be ignored.
I wonder why: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568794/