安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
The fact that it's 2024 doesn't make random programs ordering the PC to shut down a good idea. Being able to do it doesn't make it a good idea. A bunch of people demanding it without considering the problems doesn't make it a necessity to implement.
If you want to admin your PC in a certain way that's fine. But that's your job, not Valve's and not Steam's.
Can your web browser shut down your PC? Or any media player? Why not? Someone's asked for VLC to shut the PC off when a movie is done playing. Someone has demanded Mozilla add a feature to shut down the PC when a download finishes. I'd wager most software you run doesn't have random system administration features. Why do you think that is?
Yes i have several much simpler software that gives me that option.
Note that its fairly easy to come up with a dozen edge cases where the system would reboot on you as an unintened event and you'd be extermely mad steam suddenly rebooted your system 'wihtout your permission'
I wouldn't be mad Satoru. :)
I am willing to trust a platform like this to shutdown my computer.
Unless of course there are other security risks that a developer could explain.
I can build i use case around me which i assume would relate to at least some of the millions of users here but that would take me an hour to write down professionally and i don't see the point.
My post was more of a wish than it was an expectation,since no valve developer will ever answer.
But to make a long story short
i practically sleep,work and game in the same room
my bandwidth is limited and shared with the rest of the house (16 mbps dl/ 1 mbps up)
most games nowadays are ~50gb and more.
So, an option like that (for me) would be
1.a healthier benefit (less dust in the air, less noise)
2.cost effectiveness from a power consumption point of view
3.less complaining from every other family member when they want to watch subscription based television)
4.being able to download and enjoy games faster
It's not a system administration feature. Programs don't need system administrator rights to shut down the system.
A simple solution to the "I'm using the system and I forgot that I earlier told Steam to shut down when downloads are complete" problem: Steam pops up a dialog which says "Downloads complete, system shutting down in 30 seconds" with a "Cancel shutdown" button.
By default, the Windows API for causing a shutdown doesn't force applications to close, so there's no risk of unsaved data being lost by mistake.
Almost everyone. There's no particular benefit to shutting the PC down. Fast boot times are convenient, but not a benefit. The amount of electricity to keep RAM active is inconsequential. Even if you only want to use sleep once in a while, and shut the PC down most of the time, nothing wrong with using sleep in instances where you won't be there to shut the PC down yourself.
Be careful about projecting your habits onto a billion other people, or assuming your use cases are the only ones that exist or matter.
You not using sleep doesn't negate the utility of the feature.
On the matter of sleep ,speaking for me, i have already tried it long time ago, and because i use my computer for a hell of a lot of things i am not willing to change my power settings so often just to accommodate Steam. So your solution FOR ME is not optimal.
The way you speak(or write) to this and from what i saw, other posts as well, says a lot about you ,random,arrogant, non-friend.You can simply ignore my post and move on instead of your need to dictate what is wrong or right for me or my computer.
At the end of the day,best i can hope for is a conversation on a subject in here, am not asking for your opinion, especially one that does not put any value.
Seek local therapy.
Doesn't seem like something that would be worth having - either the download is fast enough to not require it, or the download is too long for it to be useful, especially when you can just make your PC shutdown by itself with a simple command like "shutdown /s /t xxx" or "/sbin/shutdown -P xxx"
Changing Steam for everyone just to accommodate you is not optimal for me.
Giving one more option that is optional is not changing steam imo.
I guess i'll have to wait.
For the Steam Deck you have to leave it on to update games/programs (sadly doesn't have a background download like the Switch which automatically updates in sleep mode) - this means it has to be fully powered up to download; which could cause screen burn in if left on a static screen (ESPECIALLY on the OLED model; ask anyone who owned a Super AMOLED phone like the Galaxy S10; this is especially true if you use an OLED display monitor display too)
This is a standard feature on torrent clients (Quit program/log off/shut down when downloads are complete)
You could jury rig something up like a terminal command in GREP or BASH to do this - but it would be nice if it was included natively in Steam client/SteamOS
Plus, there are people who prefer it the old fashioned way of not leaving their PCs on 24/7 if not being used
Why is bro so pressed, it's a suggestion, and a good one at that. Letting your computer download a big game overnight then automatically turn off instead of running and straining your hardware is a damn good idea, so stop with the whining you look childish.
Does your Steam Deck's screen not turn off when you leave it alone for a while?