Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
I've been covering the genre for four years and we've been all using this term. I picked up the term, BECAUSE it was being used by my predecessors on the subreddit, and creators like Xorrunt and devs such as Zack, from Siralim and Jason, from Monster Crown. I'm the only bigger creator in the space, so yes obviously this would bennefit myself, but ultimately, time and time again, i pick the genre over my youtube "career" if i can call it that. I do this part time as a hobby, and have continously covered games that do not benefit my channel, just to give them an extra bump. There's nothing manipulative about it, i literally say in my post my reasons for the tag being superior.
As for "tamer" it's too broad imo, but I understand why you'd want it to include robots, I'd still say medabots is a monster tamer even if it doesnt exactly fit the definition of (monster) the same way there are robot digimon and stuff like that.
You can't get away with that kind of ambiguity in a genre that already has troubles being called by a name instead of "xyz clone".
Exactly, we can allow for nuance. We can still include animals, robots and others into "monster" it's not a big deal. Most Monster Taming Games already include "monsters" that aren't really monsters. Angewoman is literally a lady with wings lol. And there's a ton of non "monster" species in SMT, etc. We don't have to be literal, but I think think Monster Taming does a good job of saying what it is, isn't too broad, but is broad enough. This is why the term has been used longer than I've even been around and why I adopted it from the beginning.
Despite including it in some of the RPGs it's fair to say Digimon largely ignored collection to focus on raising, to the point that many would argue that influence in all it's variations is it's biggest contribution to the genre. In fact Pokémon only added happiness after the explosive popularity of Digimon V-Pets.
The current name you're using for the genre is therefore equivalent to using a name for Metroidvania that actively disqualifies Metroid or Castlevania from being part of it...
THIS PERSON! THIS IS THE PERSON THAT CAME UP WITH THE 3 BRANCHES OF MONSTER TAMING!
-Monster Raising
-Monster Battling and/or
-Monster Collection