Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Автор обсуждения пометил сообщение как ответ на свой вопрос.
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
Discussions only based on facts? then these forums would be dead. You wouldn't even be able to make a post about something cool that happened in the game because yo don't have proof to show it happened.
Have you actually READ the rules? There is a very specific rule that it breaks. So I suggest you go take 10-15 minutes to read them first and if you still can't find the rule that explains why that is not allowed i'm sure someone will explain it to you.
As a test I had my 10 year old daughter read the rules and she found it, so the rules are written clear enough that the youngest steam users can understand them. Now its always possible there are language barriers, but myself and others are always happy to explain to those who can't understand them.
Also the moderators are some random 3rd party company in the Philippines or somewhere, if you think they are forming bonds and liking users then its clear you have no idea how moderation works.....
So per your logic the theory that there is a master race that is superior to other races is perfectly acceptable.... Well if you feel that way i'll strongly disagree with you, as will many other people.
Speaking. Is an action.
Hypothesis. If we're going to use scientific parlance yes.
But a theory is only as valid as it can be shown to be objectively true.
That's the problem with COnspiracty Theories. They are:
A) Almost always based on ignorance of fact.
B) Unfalsifiable
C) Encourage a mindset that causes a person to reject new information based on their emotions rather than the truth value of the information.
Facts and the applications and implications of facts are where a lot of hearty discussions take place. Especially since there;'s always a chance that you will learn new facts that you did not know before.
Yeah. theres a reason Pics or it didn't hasppen is a thing in the internet gaming community. Morseso than the words would suggest.
And you know the fact that humans do this thing called 'lying' on the regular and their tendency to lie increases in proportion to their perceived distance from the consequences of said lie.
You've gone from claiming
The rules are vague
The rules don't cover actions
The rules aren't enforced
etc.
Your changing your claims every other post because you keep making false claims that are incredibly easy to disprove. So take a few, come up with a claim that actually makes sense and that you will stick with and we can discuss it.
users wanting pics is just another form of shaming which if you watched anything on the internet you will see there is a whole level of shaming that uses pictures, today in the digital work pictures can get you in more trouble then anything, taking unauthorized pictures is just a attempt to defamation and likely to create a legal issue within itself
what i would be more concerned about is the links to steam that exist , if anyone is really connected to steam beyond just being a user they need to cease using the forum and desist from any type of interaction, as it will only implicate steam deeper into the manipulation lawsuits raised by developers.
if you own any game on steam it means there is some type of payment history and payment information linked to steam so they have real user data and that data can be warranted by the legal system to provide proof, its even possibly that users could enact a lawsuit against steam against the users that use steam because of its inability or its allowance of dangerous typical insulting and defamation.
while it would be extreme, someone who owns 1000's of games on steam would be more liable then someone who owns zero, simply because there is proof of expensive and money changed hands, it could also be considered a form of bribery because steam is receiving money from a individual and allowing them to attack other users, such as the case with steam users who own 1000's of games yet continually attack steam users who don't.
its all very serious it has to deal with both social and commerce type guide laws , that there is a major can of worms that steam opened with a forum full of offending users. that those users need to act in accordance with rules and regulations regardless of if the system wants to punish them or not.
Eh your own words prove it, but its ok, you won't admit it, and you've made up claims about me you still refuse to back up. Everyone reading this thread sees it so its no skin off my back if you want to keep sprouting falsehoods.
The truth is the rules aren't hard to follow, myself and others do it every day. So if your having issues you should look inward and see why you aren't capable of following basic rules.
Stuff like posting -rep and attacking people on their screenshots are also against the rules, but you still refuse to actually read them
You claimed i change my claim but you can't even say what.
Suggest you go back and read. Its there