Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
As well as the fact that this is for suggestions to the steam client, and steam isn't going to pay people to do anti-cheat for other developers games. You want to pitch ideas for Apex, Call of duty, etc go post it in THEIR forums and ask them to pay.
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/10/3819656548993416915/
Problems with this...
People are not going to pay to watch others play the game. If they enjoy the game they will play it not sit there for hours and watch it.
People are not going to pay to be an "overwatcher". If they enjoy the game they will play it not sit there for hours and watch it. People who have 10,000+ hours in the game, will not sit there and just watch stuff.
Valve is not going to pay people to broadcast their games.
The crypto part is DOA because Valve will NOT support crypto, just get that out of your head right now.
Last I heard, Valve is working with machine learning and teaching their system what to look for to help go after cheating. BUT this takes a long time, they don't just "give the steam a persons mind..." it has to be shown cheating videos.... hundreds of thousands or millions of cheating videos (more there are the better the system is)
As brian mentioned, if you want this for games other than Valve games, you are going to have to go and ask those game developers in their games discussion areas (another reason why the crypto stuff is DOA)
Your suggestion now is as bad as it was last time.
And I have to agree with the others, a lot of your idea is based on some flawed premises.
I think using age of account is one of those. Inventing a whole crypto coin to operate your system. The user having to pay Valve to participate. The reward system for bans or finding cheaters. I mean talk about incentivizing people to try and recoup the cost of moderating, maybe compels some biases against objective reviewing.
I mean good luck, but my prediction is it will be a cold day in hell before we see anything close to this mess being implemented.
The only people who have an actual 10,000+ hours in the game are people who idled the game or professionals who played it for e-sports. At 8 hours a day, EVERY SINGLE DAY, they could get 10,000 hours in about 3.4+ years.
There is no one who is playing that much, will have time to pay into your system to watch for cheaters or do overwatch or what ever you want to call it. Someone that is playing that much is an "e-sports professional" or they are deeply addicted to the game (get home from work, play, go to sleep, then go to work, come home and play and thats all they do), or they are idling the game in the background to get items. People who are addicted to the game, won't pay to watch, people who are idling the game, won't pay to watch. A casual player will never have the amount of time you suggest.
And I didn't even think to mention it, but nullable is right, you would be "incentivizing people to try and recoup the cost of moderating" and that means LOTS of false accusations.