Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
If it would, publishers would leave Steam entirely the same day.
Why would Valve pay you for something that is worthless to them? There is no reason for any developer or steam to facilitate this. It does nothing but hurt them.
why would steam give you anything for your "used games"? they can generate unlimited copies of it, issue an unlimited number of licenses to accounts.
the game developers have final say in this. they want to be PAID for their games, so every time a license gets added to an account, they get paid for it. you buy a game activation key, they already got paid for that license. you buy from steam, they get part of what you paid for the game.
if the devs say NO to trading licenses, then that is final. they said no already.
if you want to be able to sell/trade your games, take it up with your lawmakers. until they force the issue, its unlikely to ever happen. you may get what you asked for, but it will definitely not be what you wanted.
Valve already has record breaking numbers of users, getting more users that cost you money isn't a sound business move. Thats the problem Epic Games is having where they have lots of users, but they dont spend money. Its cost them over a BILLION dollars so far.
You want free stuff, but it has to be balanced by benefits to the person you want it from. This idea comes up all the time and its a bad one every time it comes up.
There is no benefit to Valve or anyone else to pay you for something that is worthless to them.
It would be super cool if people used the search feature and read all the other threads on the topic they want to post about first and either add to an already ongoing thread or just realize that their idea is really bad to start and that there is no fixing it to make it a better idea.
What you want means much lower money for the game Developers and for Valve. Lower money means less sales. Less sales means angry posts on the forums wanting more sales. Also means the sales that do happen will no longer include anything above 30% off.
Why do you think you never seen physical games on sale for deep discounts in stores?
It also means they will consider upping the prices and looking into stronger more invasive DRM. They would also include making everything subscription based.
"For the low low price of 50 bucks up front and just 1 dollar a month you can play our game. But soon as you stop paying the 1 dollar a month you loose access to that game and everything you have in the game. Want to play the game again? Give us another 50 bucks and start paying 1 dollar a month."...
Thats what it would more then likely end up like.
GOG did that.... they stopped doing that... can you guess why?
Valve makes record profits every year. Valve also has higher number of active users every year. Your idea won't cause even more people to join Steam, if anything it will only hurt Steam.
No, but again, its not going to benefit anyone except users who want free stuff. There are free games on steam too afterall.
Again steam has no interest in paying you for useless stuff they can't do anything with.
Not even about Valve. Valves release schedule on non-F2P games is almost non-existent.
Almost every other developer would pull out and Steam would just be a F2P store. Killing the store with a feature that doesn't even get used because there's no games to trade to buy.